Mazda BT-50 GT evaluated in Wheels Ute Megatest's 6th round of assessments in 2018
The world of mid-size pickup trucks has seen some significant changes in recent years, with the 2022 Mazda BT-50 and Ford Ranger standing out as two of the most popular choices. Despite sharing a platform and major mechanicals, these vehicles have evolved differently, offering distinct advantages and disadvantages.
Improvements and Efficiency Comparison
| Aspect | 2022 Mazda BT-50 | 2022 Ford Ranger | Improvements Over the Years (to approx. 2025) | |-----------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Shared Platform | Shares wheelbase, some body panels, and 3.2L/10-speed powertrain with Ranger | Same as BT-50; original base for BT-50 | The close partnership means updates in Ranger often affect BT-50, but Ford introduces more tech and tuning refinements regularly[3]. | | Payload | XTR 4x4 payload: 1070kg; 4x2 payload approx. 1055kg - 1081kg depending on version | Not specified for 2022 here but Ranger traditionally offers comparable payloads | Payload capacities have largely remained competitive; BT-50 offers heavy-duty leaf springs option for tougher loads[3]. | | Towing Capacity | 3500kg towing capacity (4x4 and 4x2 variants) | 2022 Ranger braked towing around 3500kg (varies by model) | Ranger's maximum towing capacity has improved in newer models, reaching up to 4500kg in 2026 models; BT-50 towing capacity stays similar at 3500kg, indicating Ford's focus on towing improvements[2]. | | Fuel Efficiency | Most efficient BT-50 (XT 2.2L turbo diesel manual) consumes about 8L/100km | Ranger tends to consume about 4% more fuel and weigh 180kg more than BT-50 in later models (SP variants compared) | Overall, BT-50 remains lighter and more fuel-efficient than Ranger variants, though Ranger often offers more power options at the cost of higher fuel use[1][4]. | | Off-Road Capability | BT-50 marginally better in approach, break-over, and departure angles than Ranger Wildtrak | Ranger Wildtrak (higher trims) has slightly lower angles but rides on taller wheels | Both vehicles have good off-road metrics; BT-50 edges out in angles and slightly better maneuverability (turning circle 12.4m BT-50 vs 12.9m Ranger) indicating slight off-road advantage in some situations[1]. | | Price | BT-50 generally about $5,000 less than comparable Ranger Wildtrak variants | More expensive, especially in mid to high trims | BT-50 positions itself as a cost-effective alternative with similar core capabilities and less weight[1]. | | Interior & Features (2022) | Offers premium features such as 8-inch touchscreen, leather steering wheel and gear selector, dusk sensor headlights, rain sensor wipers | Ranger offers rugged, practical design focused on durability | Incremental tech feature improvements ongoing in Ranger; BT-50 also updated but emphasis remains on robust drivetrain rather than luxury[4][2]. |
Summary
- Both trucks share a platform and similar core engines but differ in tuning, features, and weight.
- Mazda BT-50 is lighter, slightly more fuel-efficient, and cheaper, with comparable payload and towing capacity in 2022.
- Ford Ranger has seen noticeable improvements, especially in towing capacity (up to 4500kg in 2026 models), technology, and some powertrain refinements, often at the cost of increased weight and fuel consumption.
- Off-road angles and maneuverability slightly favor BT-50, while Ranger offers more trim variety and possibly more advanced tech in recent years.
- Both maintain strong positions, with Mazda focusing on value and efficiency, Ford on power and capability upgrades over time.
This makes the BT-50 a more economical, slightly lighter option with good capabilities, while the Ranger leads in towing improvements and technology enhancements through the years after 2022[1][2][3][4].
It's important to note that the Mazda BT-50 lacks advanced safety features such as forward collision mitigation, lane departure warning systems, and adaptive cruise control compared to the Ford Ranger. However, for those seeking a cost-effective, reliable, and capable mid-size pickup truck, the BT-50 remains a strong contender.
[1] CarExpert (2022). Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50 comparison. [Online]. Available: https://www.carexpert.com.au/ford-ranger-vs-mazda-bt-50-comparison
[2] CarsGuide (2022). Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50 comparison. [Online]. Available: https://www.carsguide.com.au/car-reviews/ford/ranger/2022/ford-ranger-vs-mazda-bt-50-2022-comparison-36878
[3] CarAdvice (2022). Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50 comparison. [Online]. Available: https://www.caradvice.com.au/623204/2022-ford-ranger-vs-2022-mazda-bt-50-comparison/
[4] Drive (2022). Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50 comparison. [Online]. Available: https://www.drive.com.au/reviews/ford-ranger-vs-mazda-bt-50-2022-comparison-36717
- The 2022 Mazda BT-50 and the Ford Ranger, despite sharing a platform, have distinct advantages in the Realm of Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs), with the BT-50 offering economical fuel consumption and affordability.
- In the realm of sports vehicles, the Ford Ranger, on the other hand, has focused on improving towing capacity and incorporating technological advancements, making it an appealing option for those who prioritize power and capability.
