Manipulation of Society's Perception: Tavistock Institute Guides the Shaping of Reality
In his book "The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations: Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political and Economic Decline of the United States of America," author John Coleman presents a critical examination of the Tavistock Institute, a London-based organisation known for human relations research and applied social science.
Coleman's work, however, takes a conspiratorial perspective, suggesting that the Institute has been covertly manipulating society, particularly in the U.S., for the purpose of destabilizing societies through psychological and sociological manipulation.
Historically, the Tavistock Institute was established post-World War II, focusing on understanding and improving human relations within family units, workplaces, and social groups. It gained recognition for applying psychoanalytic and social science theories into practical interventions, including mental health services and organizational consultation.
However, Coleman's book diverges from this mainstream narrative, alleging that the Tavistock Institute's activities extend beyond research and therapy into covert social engineering, aimed at undermining traditional values and institutions in the U.S., contributing to a perceived societal decline.
The details used by Coleman to support these claims typically include interpretations of the Institute's research and projects in psychological warfare, cultural studies, and leadership manipulation. However, these claims are not widely accepted in academic or professional circles.
In mainstream academic and professional contexts, Tavistock is recognized for advancing understanding of social systems and providing therapeutic and organizational interventions. Its influence on sociology, psychology, and organisational theory is significant but oriented towards positive change rather than the decline suggested by Coleman.
Coleman's book also claims that the elite, including the royal family, the Rockefellers, and the Rothschilds, have been manipulating society for nearly a century, scripting events such as democracy, wars, and pandemics. He argues that Tavistock is responsible for massacres like the one at Waco, where David Koresh and his followers were killed after being falsely accused.
Moreover, Coleman suggests that Tavistock has an "invisible army" of actors infiltrating various institutions and organisations at the local, national, and international levels, including justice systems, police, churches, schools, media, town councils, state legislatures, and Washington.
He also claims that the techniques of propaganda used to justify war, originated by Tavistock, have been used consistently in wars such as World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Gulf War.
Coleman further argues that Tavistock is waging war on the Muslim world because Islam represents an obstacle to its control. He also states that God is synonymous with PERFECTION, while the Illuminati redefines reality to serve their occult dogmas, material interests, and perversions.
Orson Welles' Martian invasion in 1938 and the power blackout in the Northeast in 2003, according to Coleman, were probably studies of mass behaviour conducted by Tavistock.
Critics argue that Coleman's book presents a dramatic and controversial portrayal of the Tavistock Institute, which is outside the consensus of established research and institutional histories of the Institute. The mainstream understanding emphasizes Tavistock's contributions to human relations research and mental health, rather than any intentional cultural or political decline.
Articles discussing the controversial book "The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations: Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political and Economic Decline of the United States of America" by John Coleman often highlight the author's claims that the Institute's influence reaches beyond general-news areas like politics and sociology, extending into covert social engineering aimed at eroding traditional values through manipulation of education, truth, and public perception. However, these claims are not universally accepted in academic and professional circles, where Tavistock is generally recognized for its positive contributions to human relations research and applied social science.
