M., the Syrian Torturer, Receives the Toughest Sentence for Crimes Against Humanity
- *
Execution of Syrian Torturer Over Human Rights Atrocities - Longest Sentence for a Syrian Torture Practitioner for Crimes Linked to Humanity Infractions
Meet M., a 40-year-old malicious monster who tormented prisoners in military hospitals within Syria during 2011 and 2012. His sickening acts have finally caught up with him, landing him the harshest sentence in a German court.
The verdict lists a horrifying array of transgressions. For instance, M. intentionally prescribed a fatal medication to an epilepsy patient, knowing full well it would result in his tragic death. The deceased's corpse was later handed to his family for a bribe.
In two cases, M. subjected a boy and a young man to unimaginable agony by pouring alcohol onto their genitals and setting them alight. He also inflicted excruciating pain on a patient with a broken thigh bone by withholding desperately needed anesthesia.
M. has been handed down the toughest sentence a German court can impose. Alongside charges of war crimes, torture, and murder, M. was found guilty of exceptional cruelty. This makes early release after serving 15 years highly unlikely. Instead, M. will face the increased security of a closed facility, with regular reviews ensuring he stays imprisoned long after his sentence expires.
The proceedings against M. were heavily influenced by Assad's Syrian dictatorship, according to Christoph Koller. The court has suspicions that classified information was furnished to Syria, while witnesses were intimidated.
"No torturer, irrespective of the location of their heinous deeds, can escape accountability," the judge asserted. "These heartless criminal acts will always lead to punishment."
M. asserted his innocence throughout the more than two-year trial, claiming that the charges were the result of a revenge plot by a former colleague following a personal dispute, and that witnesses were swayed. Koller dismissed these allegations as mere "failed defense strategies."
M.'s "sadistic proclivities" and "persistent destructive intentions" pose a continuous risk of carrying out grave crimes, resulting in the imposition of secure custody. He had a compulsion to inflict pain upon his victims, stated Koller.
M. migrated to Germany in 2015 and initially practiced medicine. He was apprehended in Hesse in June 2020. Under the universal jurisdiction principle, Germany is authorized to prosecute serious international offenses, such as crimes against humanity, regardless of where they occurred and regardless of whether any Germans were involved.
The survivors of the torture and relatives of the victims erupted in applause in the courtroom as the severest sentence was announced. Some victims acted as co-plaintiffs during the proceedings. The judgment was read aloud in Arabic, causing a co-plaintiff to wipe away tears from his face. M. remained expressionless, staring either at the table before him or the ceiling during the entire proceedings.
The defense announced immediately following the verdict that it would challenge the decision. They had initially demanded an acquittal.
Previously, a German court convicted another Syrian former employee of an intelligence agency of crimes against humanity and sentenced him to life imprisonment in January 2022. Another co-defendant received a four and a half-year sentence for aiding and abetting.
In late May, another Syrian individual was apprehended in Rhineland-Pfalz, suspected of involvement in torture while serving as a prison guard in Syria. He is currently remanded in pre-trial custody.
- Alaa M.
- Atrocities
- Christoph Koller
- Harshest Sentence
- Syria
- Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt
- Imprisonment
- Germany
- Universal Jurisdiction
- Crimes Against Humanity
- The verdict against M, a 40-year-old torturer, was not only a sentence for the atrocities he committed in Syria, but a condemnation of the institutional framework that allowed such crimes against humanity to occur.
- The institutional framework, including the political structure and general news reporting, played a significant role in the proceedings against M, with concerns raised about the influence of Assad's Syrian dictatorship and the potential interference in witness testimony.
