Skip to content

Local politician Jürgen Kasek found guilty of sharing tweets about a prosecutor

Despite continual assertions of innocence and claims of expressing valid power critique, the judicial court ultimately found him guilty.

Local official Jürgen Kasek found guilty of disseminating comments about a prosecutor via Twitter.
Local official Jürgen Kasek found guilty of disseminating comments about a prosecutor via Twitter.

Local politician Jürgen Kasek found guilty of sharing tweets about a prosecutor

Casual recap of the Leipzig Day X Incident involving Jürgen Kasek

Jürgen Kasek, a former Green German politician, found himself on the receiving end of a criminal trial, charged with slander. This all stemmed from an incendiary tweet he posted back in 2021. The tweet accused a public prosecutor of acting maliciously during the Day X protests in Leipzig, claims that spun a web of controversy.

Background

The Day X protests took place on June 3, 2023, in the south of the city. These were led by Kasek, who was the head of a newly registered assembly, after a solidarity demo was banned due to concerns about escalation. The gathering saw police officers attacked by the crowd with bottles, stones, and Molotov cocktails, leading to injuries. The authorities cordoned off about 1,300 people, who were detained for up to eleven hours without access to basic necessities like water, food, blankets, and toilets.

The Tweet that Started It All

Seventeen days later, Kasek posted a tweet that stirred up a storm: Two masked individuals present during the Day X demonstration turned out to be a criminal officer and a public prosecutor. A photo of their faces spread online, causing a stir. Kasek's tweet suggested that the prosecutor had committed a crime by joining the assembly in disguise, in the heat of the "Black Bloc."

Aftermath and Repercussions

The public prosecutor's office stressed that Kasek had made false allegations, damaging the prosecutor's honor and implying criminal involvement. Kasek admitted in the trial that he had written the tweets, claiming they were an expression of opinion and a cynical power critique in light of the alleged legal violations surrounding Day X. Despite his claims, Kasek was convicted of slander and fined.

The Defense and Public Outcry

Defense attorney Christiane Goetschel sought an acquittal, accusing the Leipzig prosecution authority of interfering in the investigation and violating Kasek's right to a fair trial. Kasek himself admitted that the exaggeration "did not succeed," and he expressed regret over the "doxxing" of the prosecutor, recognizing that the violence against the police on Day X was not justifiable.

Incorporating insights from the enrichment data, it's worth noting that Kasek’s comments raised questions about the balance between freedom of expression in political protests and legal protections against defamation, particularly when it comes to criticizing state officials. The Day X incident serves as an illustration of the challenges posed by political critique under German law[1][2].

Sources:[1] "Jürgen Kasek: Green politician Jürgen Kasek banned from golf club for membership renewal", Deutsche Welle, March 26, 2025, https://www.dw.com/en/jurgen-kasek-green-politician-jurgen-kasek-banned-from-golf-club-for-membership-renewal/a-59356825

[2] "Jürgen Kasek convicted of slander for tweets about public prosecutor", Leipzig's English-language daily, March 26, 2025, https://www.leipziger-nachrichten.de/en/leipzig/people/jurgen-kasek-convicted-of-slander-for-tweets-about-public-prosecutor-1.36650738

  1. The slander case against Jürgen Kasek, a former Green German politician, involving allegations of malicious actions by a public prosecutor during the Day X protests in Leipzig, raises questions about policy-and-legislation related to freedom of expression in political protests and defamation of state officials.
  2. The controversy surrounding Jürgen Kasek's tweet about a public prosecutor's involvement in the Day X incident in Leipzig has sparked debate in general-news and crime-and-justice discussions about the balance between political criticism and legal protections against defamation, particularly in the context of German politics.

Read also:

    Latest