Skip to content

Legislative negotiations intensify as the legislative session progresses

Politicians could link diverse subjects, such as school finance and THC restrictions, as bargaining chips to push their top legislative proposals forward.

Political negotiators could link dissimilar matters, such as funding for education and restrictions...
Political negotiators could link dissimilar matters, such as funding for education and restrictions on THC, as a strategy to push their preferred legislation forward.

Legislative negotiations intensify as the legislative session progresses

The 2025 Texas legislative session is approaching its final stages, with only two weeks left before adjournment on June 2. Nonetheless, essential bills, such as SB 3 and HB 2, remain unresolved and poised to undergo significant negotiations during this time-constrained period.

As the House and Senate endeavor to reach agreements, horse-trading — a common tactic in state politics — could play a critical role in shaping the fate of these bills. Brandon Rottinghaus, a political scientist at the University of Houston, explains that horse-trading is a natural part of the legislative process and occurs when both chambers negotiate and make concessions to reach an agreement.

In this legislative session, the school funding bill, HB 2, and the THC ban bill, SB 3, are at the center of the horse-trading game. Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, who leads the Senate, advocates for the THC ban, aiming to ban all forms of THC, while the House prioritizes the school funding bill.

Many find it troubling when the fate of such bills becomes intertwined. Daphne Hoffacker, chair of the Austin Council of PTAs, criticized this strategy as "absolutely appalling." In the past, school funding and vouchers were perceived as the Texas Two-Step. Yet, in the current legislative session, the link has expanded to include THC.

Chloe Latham-Sikes, deputy director of policy at the Intercultural Development Research Association, expressed disheartening sentiments about the situation. She noted that school funding was once again being used to prioritize non-education-related matters, potentially undermining critical per-student and student-driven funding approved by the House in April.

Lobbyists and legislators view these negotiations as a form of compromise, with Rice University political scientist Mark Jones stating that such practices were once common but are increasingly considered a form of capitulation by many.

The critical question remains: Will either the House or Senate yield the least, determining the future of SB 3 and HB 2?

In the meantime, stakeholders, lobbyists, and the public will be closely watching the unfolding negotiations. The outcome of these crucial bills will significantly impact various sectors of Texas, including education and veteran services.

  1. The ongoing negotiations between the House and Senate in the 2025 Texas legislative session, focusing on essential bills like SB 3 and HB 2, have garnered attention not just from political analysts but also from organizations like education and veteran services, as the outcome could have far-reaching implications for these sectors.
  2. As horse-trading tactics are employed to reach agreements on these bills, concerned voices, such as Daphne Hoffacker of the Austin Council of PTAs, have criticized the intertwining of bills, like the THC ban and school funding, as "absolutely appalling."
  3. Amidst growing concerns about the politicization of education funds and non-education-related matters influencing policy-and-legislation, the 2025 Texas legislative session is shaping up to be a critical juncture in state politics, with news and general-news outlets closely following the negotiations, as the result could shape the future of war-and-conflicts, education, and policy-and-legislation in Texas.

Read also:

Latest