Skip to content

Leaked reports on AfD: Insights from the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution regarding the Alternative for Germany party

Stolen AfD Special Report Unveiled: Insights from the Office for the Protection of the Constitution on the Alternative for Germany Party

"Neo-Nazis Mentioned: AFD's Constitutional Protection Report Highlights These Individuals"
"Neo-Nazis Mentioned: AFD's Constitutional Protection Report Highlights These Individuals"

Unveiled: The Constitution Protection Agency's Hard-Hitting Report on the AfD

  • Approx 3 Min Read

Disclosed AFDEvaluation: Insights from the Office for the Protection of the Constitution's Perspective on the AFDB Party - Leaked reports on AfD: Insights from the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution regarding the Alternative for Germany party

The AfD has been under the microscope since its inception, and now, the entire party finds itself in the hot seat as the Constitution Protection Agency labels it as securely right-wing extremist. Over the past few years, authorities have amassed concerns over the party's controversial statements, anti-democratic acts, and biased views of minorities and immigrants. These findings are outlined in the 1108-page report, leaked by "Ask the State" and "Der Spiegel."

In May, the authority deemed the federal party unconstitutional, keeping the report under wraps. However, excerpts have since surfaced, with the report meticulously analyzing remarks from 353 members, including party leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla and Bundestag member Maximilian Krah. The report accuses these individuals of propagating partly anti-democratic, anti-foreigner, and anti-Islamic views. The "top leadership" within the AfD exhibits a "consolidated anti-foreigner attitude," according to the constitution protection agency.

The party leadership was quick to respond, denouncing the "misuse of state power to target and marginalize opposition." The AfD is now taking legal action against the Constitution Protection Agency, challenging their classification as a right-wing extremist party.

Racist Remarks and Controversial Stances

Since 2021, the Constitution Protection Agency has been keeping a watchful eye on the AfD, labeling it as a right-wing extremist suspect. The report paints a picture of a party that has gradually shifted to the extreme right, with the liberal-conservative faction fading away. The report highlights a concerning radicalization, particularly since 2023, with the völkisch-nationalist camp gaining significant influence.

Top Political Insights

Subscribe to our free Berlin-centric newsletter, where you'll find the most critical information of the week, handpicked by our knowledgeable political experts.

AfD members have shown contempt towards migrants, labeling them second-class citizens. Bit by bit, the report corroborates this claim through numerous racist, xenophobic, and völkisch statements made by AfD members. In August 2023, Hannes Gnauck, then chairman of the Young Alternative, made inflammatory remarks at a campaign event in Brandenburg, stating, "We must decide again who truly belongs to this people and who does not." He continued, "This is simply a law of nature, and we can all be damn proud of it."

The AfD and Islam

In the "Islamophobia" chapter, the report mentions an interview with Alice Weidel on a YouTube channel at the end of 2023, during which she made broad, negative statements about Muslims. Weidel implied that Germany had created a "massive socio-political problem" with the influx of "culturally foreign people," a statement that contradicts our liberal democratic constitutional order.

During last September's Brandenburg state election campaign, Weidel escalated her anti-Muslim rhetoric, branding immigrant crime as "jihad," and accusing Islam of waging a "religious war against the German population."

Terms such as "knife migration," "knife immigration," "knife jihad," "over-foreignization," or the controversial term "remigration" reflect a consistent narrative within the AfD, according to the constitutional protectors.

Attacks on Democracy

The report also criticizes the AfD for targeting the democratic principle outlined in the Basic Law. The domestic intelligence agency has cited numerous examples of AfD politicians launching attacks on their political opponents. Chrupalla, for instance, referred to CDU politicians Friedrich Merz and Norbert Röttgen, along with Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock (Greens), as "vassals of America" at a Nuremberg demonstration in April 2023.

Krah, an AfD European politician, responded to a Green Party politician's comment on migration policy with, "This Green master plan means ethnic transformation."

Not every polemical power critique is grounds for intervention by the constitutional protection agency, the authority notes. However, it is crucial when the opponent's right to exist is denied.

The Debate over the AfD Ban Process

Germany's recent classification of the AfD as a confirmed right-wing extremist has rekindled the long-standing debate over banning the party. The new federal government is currently in a holding pattern. Chancellor Friedrich Merz stressed the need for careful analysis before politically evaluating the report from the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. He added, "I myself do not want to make any recommendations for further conclusions by the government until the report has been thoroughly reviewed."

Merz, however, is unequivocal about the prospect of AfD members being appointed to committee chairs in the Bundestag, stating, "At least since last weekend, it's unimaginable to me that members of the German Bundestag would elect AfD members to committee chairs."

  • AfD
  • Alice Weidel
  • Tino Chrupalla
  • Maximilian Krah
  • Hannes Gnauck
  • Muslims
  1. The Commission has not yet adopted a proposal for a directive on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to ionizing radiation, but the unconstitutional actions of the AfD have garnered significant attention.
  2. In the realm of politics, the mitigation of extreme views is crucial, yet the AfD's policy-and-legislation, general-news, and crime-and-justice stances have been criticized for their biased and controversial nature.
  3. The leak of the Constitution Protection Agency's report has shed light on the AfD's controversial approaches, particularly their sports-betting policies that seem to lack impartiality.
  4. The AfD's leaders, including Alice Weidel, Tino Chrupalla, and Maximilian Krah, have been accused of propagating partly anti-democratic, anti-foreigner, and anti-Islamic views, as highlighted in the agency's report.
  5. In sports, the AfD's stance on migrant athletes has been a topic of discussion, with some members labeling them as second-class citizens, echoing the party's disdain for immigrants in their general-news and crime-and-justice policies.
  6. Meanwhile, the sports world has largely remained neutral on the AfD's constitutional status, focusing instead on the quality of competition and sportsmanship.

Read also:

Latest