Unveiling the Office for the Protection of the Constitution's Take on the AfD: A Scathing Assessment
- ~3 Min
Alleged Internal Document from Office for the Protection of the Constitution: Insights on the Alternative for Germany Party Revealed - Leaked Reports on AfD: Constitutional Protection Office Confirms Authenticity
Ever since its inception, the AfD has been under the microscope. Four state associations bearing the AfD label have been tagged by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution as undeniably right-wing extremist - a classification that now extends to the entire party. According to the authorities, an amalgamation of inhumane declarations and positions, anti-democratic leanings, and questionable views on the countrymen have piled up over the years, leading to this judgment. This is the gist of the 1108-page assessment penned by Germany's domestic intelligence service about the country's largest opposition party.
In May, the authority designated the federal party unconstitutional while keeping the assessment inconspicuous. However, the platform "Ask the State" and the news magazine "Der Spiegel" managed to publish snippets from the document. It delves into accessible sources like speeches, interviews, and contributions from 353 members, including party leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla, as well as Bundestag member Maximilian Krah, and brands several of them as partly anti-democratic, xenophobic, and Islamophobic. The Office for the Protection of the Constitution concludes that there is a "solidified xenophobic attitude" in the "top leadership structure of the AfD".
The party leadership voiced their anger. Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla cried foul, claiming the misuse of state power to combat and marginalize the opposition. The AfD has now initiated legal action against the Office for the Protection of the Constitution for upgrading it as an undeniably right-wing extremist party.
Draped in Racism: The AfD's Disconcerting Views
Since 2021, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution has flagged the AfD as a potential right-wing extremist case. The assessment paints a grim picture of a party transitioning increasingly towards the right in recent years. Members from the liberal conservative faction have gradually departed from the party. The constitutional guardians have noticed a radicalization, especially since 2023, and express no signs of abatement. The völkisch-nationalist camp dominates, the assessment asserts.
Glance at Federal Politics: The Essentials Conveyed by Our Berlin Experts
- Subscribe to our free capital newsletter - and stay updated on the essential information of the week, handpicked for you by our Berlin political experts!
Functionaries of the party exhibit distinctions between "authentic" Germans and "document Germans." Individuals with a migration background are perceived as second-class citizens in the party, the report suggests, based on xenophobic, racist, and völkisch statements by AfD members.
For instance, Hannes Gnauck, the AfD Bundestag member and former chairman of the then youth organization Junge Alternative, made insensitive remarks at a Brandenburg campaign event last August. He declared, "We must also determine again who truly belongs to this people and who does not. Each of you is tied to me more than any Syrian or any Afghan." Gnauck further characterized this as "simply a law of nature, and we can all take pride in it." Gnauck was also heard uttering the term "population exchange" in another speech.
The AfD and Islam
In the chapter "Islamophobia," the Office for the Protection of the Constitution emphasizes an interview with Alice Weidel on a YouTube channel in late 2023, during which she crafted wide-ranging undermining statements about Muslims. Weidel stated that Germany bore responsibility for creating "an immense socio-political problem" with the influx of "culturally alien individuals." This, according to her, contravenes our liberal democratic constitutional order.
In a campaign speech for the Brandenburg state election in September of 2023, Weidel amplified her anti-Muslim sentiments, accusing her of "hostile jihad against non-Muslims in Germany." Weidel spoke about the religious conflict, saying, "These are developments, the harassment, the rapes, that are something entirely new to our country. What we're experiencing on German streets is jihad. A religious war against the German populace is already underway."
Common expressions like "knife migration," "knife immigration," "knife jihad," "over-foreignization," or the controversial term "re-migration" are not casual outbursts, but a recurring narrative within the AfD, the constitutional vigilance postulates.
Amenable to Democracy?
The party, however, is not only targeting minorities and migrants. The domestic intelligence agency accuses party members of also targeting the "democratic principle" enshrined in the Basic Law. The report cites statements by AfD politicians who have defamed politicians from other parties as "traitors to the people."
For example, co-party leader Chrupalla, at a demonstration in Nuremberg in April 2023, insulted CDU politicians Friedrich Merz and Norbert Röttgen, as well as then-Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock (Greens), as "American puppets." AfD Europe politician Maximilian Krah commented on a statement by Green politician Katrin Göring-Eckardt on migration policy on X: "This Green master plan means ethnic replacement."
While not every bitter power critique falls under the purview of the constitutional protection agency, it becomes critical when the political opponent's right to exist is denied.
The AfD Ban Debate: Rekindling Old Flames
The classification of the AfD as an undeniably right-wing extremist party in Germany has stirred the long-standing debate over banning the party. The new federal government is currently staying cautious. Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the assessment from the constitutional protection agency must first be meticulously analyzed before it can be politically evaluated. "And before such an evaluation is made, I personally do not want to make any recommendations for further conclusions by the government," Merz reiterated.
However, the Chancellor unequivocally rejects the election of AfD members to committee chairs in the Bundestag following the classification by the domestic intelligence agency. "At least since last weekend, it is unimaginable to me that members of the German Bundestag elect AfD members to committee chairs."
- AfD
- Alice Weidel
- Tino Chrupalla
- Maximilian Krah
- Hannes Gnauck
- Muslims
- The Commission, as of yet, has not adopted a proposal for a directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens in the context of the ongoing debate about the AfD's classification as undeniably right-wing extremist.
- The Office for the Protection of the Constitution's assessment of the AfD as unconstitutional, while keeping it inconspicuous, has sparked tendencies of war-and-conflicts and crime-and-justice discussions in politics and general news.
- Der Spiegel magazine's publication of snippets from the Office for the Protection of the Constitution's assessment on the AfD reveals instances of questionable views on the countrymen, anti-democratic leanings, and xenophobic, Islamophobic, and völkisch statements by several party leaders, including Alice Weidel, Tino Chrupalla, and Maximilian Krah.
- In light of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution's assessment, the AfD's policy-and-legislation and its protection of minorities, particularly Muslims, is under scrutiny for potential violations of the democratic principle enshrined in the Basic Law.
- The debate over the potential party ban for the AfD, rekindled by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution's classification, continues to polarize German politics, with opinions on the matter varying among political parties and the general public.
