Lawyers in Patna High Court plan to abstain from Acting Chief Justice's Court due to alleged inactivity concerning the assault of two legal professionals.
The Patna High Court is currently witnessing an unprecedented event, as three of its key associations - the Advocate Association, Lawyers Association, and Bar Association - have collectively decided to boycott court hearings before Acting Chief Justice PB Bajanthri. The resolution, passed by the Coordination Committee of these associations on Tuesday, calls for the boycott of proceedings before Justice Bajanthri's court.
The boycott is a significant action, as it involves the refusal of legal professionals to participate in court proceedings. The boycott is taking place at the Patna High Court and is not related to any advertisements or external factors, but is a result of internal court proceedings.
The boycott is a response to certain proceedings before Justice PB Bajanthri's court at the Patna High Court. The exact nature of these proceedings that have led to the boycott is not publicly specified at this time. The resolution was passed on Tuesday, and the boycott is ongoing, as no information about its conclusion has been provided in the article.
The boycott at the Patna High Court is targeted at Justice PB Bajanthri, the Acting Chief Justice. The resolution was passed by the Coordination Committee of the Advocate Association, Lawyers Association, and Bar Association, and the boycott involves the refusal of the Advocate Association, Lawyers Association, and Bar Association to participate in court proceedings before Justice PB Bajanthri.
This collective action by the three associations is a significant development, as it underscores the growing discontent within the legal fraternity at the Patna High Court. The impact of the boycott remains to be seen, but it is clear that it is a powerful statement of dissent from the legal professionals who are an integral part of the functioning of the court.
The exact timeline and duration of the boycott are not clear at this time, but it is expected to continue until the issues that have led to the boycott are resolved. It remains to be seen how the court will respond to this unprecedented action and what steps will be taken to address the concerns of the legal professionals who have decided to boycott the court proceedings.
Read also:
- United States tariffs pose a threat to India, necessitating the recruitment of adept negotiators or strategists, similar to those who had influenced Trump's decisions.
- Weekly happenings in the German Federal Parliament (Bundestag)
- Southwest region's most popular posts, accompanied by an inquiry:
- Discussion between Putin and Trump in Alaska could potentially overshadow Ukraine's concerns
