Skip to content

Lawsuit Involving Taylor Swift Alleges Unfair Claim of Copyright Infringement

Demonstration in opposition to legal notices issued

Swift's spokesperson claims the subpoena aims to create public interest and clickbait by using her...
Swift's spokesperson claims the subpoena aims to create public interest and clickbait by using her name, rather than concentrating on the case facts.

Unofficial Update: Taylor Swift's manager spoke up, asserting that Swift wasn't on the set of the movie, never involved in creative decision-making, and didn't even catch a peek at the film until it was already released.

In an unexpected twist, Taylor Swift finds herself in a legal bind, following a subpoena requiring her to testify in the high-profile juxtaposition between actors Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. Media outlets like the BBC are abuzz with speculation concerning Swift's influence in the production of "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood."

Reports first surfaced in January, linking Swift to the case through exchanged text messages between the actors. Amidst allegations of script alterations for a friend of Lively, Swift seems far from content.

According to Swift's representatives, the subpoena seems to be just a ploy to generate buzz instead of focusing on the crux of the matter. It's not clear if or how Swift may need to take the stand.

Lively caused a stir in December, filing a lawsuit against Baldoni and producer Jamey Heath, accusing them of sexual harassment during the film's production. Meanwhile, Baldoni retaliated with a defamation suit against Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds.

Sports - Donald's Darts: Trump sideswipes Taylor Swift at NFL event

  • Taylor Swift
  • Celebrity Justice
  • Gossip

Sources: ntv.de, toh/dpa

Swift Saga Summary

  • Summons: Swift's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, issued the subpoena, seeking her testimony for the ongoing legal squabble[2][3][4].
  • Limited Engagement: Swift's team clarified her role was limited to the licensing of her song "My Tears Ricochet" for the film, with no involvement in the set, creative decisions, or post-production[3][4].
  • Resistance: Swift's representatives characterized the subpoena as an attempt to garner public attention without substantial evidence related to the case[4].

The Lively-Baldoni Saga

  • The Battle of Hollywood: The case has been a continuous legal spat, with Lively preparing to testify in the trial slated for March 2026[1].
  • Charges and Countercharges: Lively's allegations led to a countersuit by Baldoni for defamation, with Baldoni seeking $400 million from Lively and Reynolds[4].
  • Undercover Evidence: Baldoni's team hinted at presenting unedited receipts and footage to support their claims[1].

I'm not going to be able to testify in Blake Lively's legal battle with Justin Baldoni, as my manager asserted that I wasn't involved in the film's production. Swift's alleged connection to the case, due to exchanged text messages, continues to generate buzz in the entertainment industry. According to Swift's representatives, the subpoena seems to be a ploy for attention rather than focusing on the core of the legal matter. The ongoing legal dispute between Lively and Baldoni, involving allegations of sexual harassment and defamation, has been a swift saga in Hollywood.

Read also:

Latest