Skip to content

Lahm criticizes "questionable procedures" in World Cup awarding process

Lahm criticizes "questionable procedures" in World Cup awarding process

Lahm criticizes "questionable procedures" in World Cup awarding process
Lahm criticizes "questionable procedures" in World Cup awarding process

Critiquing the Suspect World Cup Bidding Process: Lahm Speaks Out

World champion and ex-captain Phillip Lahm, now serving as the European Championship tournament director, has voiced his disapproval of the shady tactics surrounding the bidding process for the 2034 FIFA World Cup, with Saudi Arabia being the only hopeful candidate. Known for its poor human rights record, the kingdom is the only competitor in the eleven-year race. The decision, scheduled for the FIFA Congress in late 2023, seems to be a foregone conclusion.

Lahm raised concerns about the current state of affairs, highlighting the dramatic downfall of the democratic impact soccer events can have and expressing his dissatisfaction with the recent tendencies in favor of Saudi Arabia. "The sequence of events recenty indicates a lot is going wrong," Lahm stated in an interview with Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland. He further added, "The focus on democracy that soccer tournaments can bring has taken a back seat. The decisions and procedures recently have been very questionable."

The Controversy Unfolds

On Halloween, FIFA President Gianni Infantino announced Saudi Arabia as one of the hosts for the next three World Cup finals via Instagram. This decision follows FIFA's rotation principle, which favors hosting by Asian or Oceanic countries for this tournament. Since Australia pulled out of the competition, Saudi Arabia is the sole contender.

Lahm echoed the sentiments of skeptical soccer fans, "The credibility is missing. It gives the impression that it's all about the money. That's damaging to soccer, because soccer thrives on its original credibility." Athletes, managers, and organizations that harm soccer's well-being with their decisions or actions, Lahm emphasized, ultimately affect society itself.

Enriching the Discussion

This controversy concerning FIFA's choice of a host country for the 2034 World Cup has intensified due to concerns about transparency, favoritism, and disregard for human rights issues. Three central arguments against the bidding process reflect these concerns:

  1. Lack of Transparency: The bidding process lacked transparency, with the decision being made without a thorough, open process, leading to the uncontested selection of Saudi Arabia.
  2. Manipulation of Rules: FIFA altered the rules to suit Saudi Arabia's bid, making it easier for them to compete.
  3. Favoritism and Influence: FIFA President Gianni Infantino plays a key role in bending rules in favor of Saudi Arabia, raising suspicions over favoritism.

Looking Ahead

These challenges highlight the need for FIFA to address the concerns raised by critics, such as ex-National Team captain Phillip Lahm and others, regarding the transparency and credibility of the World Cup bidding process. By ensuring a fair, open, and transparent bidding process, FIFA can help restore stakeholders' confidence and ensure a more positive, democratic impact for the 2034 World Cup.

Latest