Skip to content

Kretschmann discusses permit issues related to head-screens in Berlin

Right-wing AfD group announces statement from Stuttgart's parliament, Baden-Württemberg, June 24, 2025 - A faction of the extremist AfD unveils their press release

Berlin's Head Screen Permit Discussed by Kretschmann
Berlin's Head Screen Permit Discussed by Kretschmann

AFD's Crusade on Headscarves in Schools: A Divisive Debate in Baden-Württemberg

Newswire Dispatch:

Stuttgart, June 24, 2025

The Afd (Alternative for Germany) party's spokesperson on legal and religious affairs, Rüdiger Klos MdL, has thrown a jab at Minister-President Kretschmann (Greens) for evading a question on the infamous Berlin initiative to amend the neutrality law. Klos has bashed Kretschmann's stance as a cowardly surrender to Islamic demands, alleging it erodes the state's sovereignty.

Klos argues that Kretschmann's reluctance to comment on the issue underscores a dangerous capitulation to Islamic power claims. Instead of championing schools as sanctuaries of ideological diversity, he accuses Kretschmann of toeing the line for a symbol that embodies patriarchal oppression, religious dominance, and cultural isolation in several regions - the headscarf. Klos asserts that the headscarf is not merely a religious symbol, but a politically charged statement that reflects systemic female subjugation in many Islamic societies.

In a bold move, the Afd demands the enforcement of ideological neutrality in schools, prohibiting religious emblems from the classroom and stemming the rise of political indoctrination. They caution against the surreptitious goodwill of 'tolerance' that would make the headscarf a normalized teaching uniform. If this goes unchecked, the Afd fears, it would further broaden the chasm in society.

According to the Afd, treating a symbol of inequality with reverence in the classroom would fuel the door swinging wide for social division. This contentious stance shines a light on a profound cleavage within societal debates on gender equality, Islamic integration, and the secular nature of public education.

Mailing Address

Afd Fraction in the Baden-Württemberg State Parliamentc/o Rüdiger Klos MdLKonrad-Adenauer-Straße 370173 Stuttgart

Visiting Address

Afd Fraction in the Baden-Württemberg State ParliamentHouse of Parliament: U32/305Urbanstraße 3270182 Stuttgart

Insider Intel:

  • The Afd's war on headscarves in schools mirrors broader regional measures that have outlawed face-covering Islamic veils like the burqa and niqab in educational settings.
  • The Afd takes issue with the headscarf as a symbol of gender inequality and a potential roadblock to secularism and shared values within schools.
  • Critics contend that the Afd's stance risks stigmatizing and alienating Muslim communities, threatening social cohesion. They argue that European human rights frameworks uphold the right to religious expression, and that blanket bans in schools infringe on this freedom.

The Afd (Alternative for Germany) party's stance on the headscarf in schools, as evident in their debate in Baden-Württemberg, is a part of broader policy-and-legislation discussions in politics, relating to the general-news of the region. The Afd views the headscarf as a symbol of gender inequality and a potential threat to secularism, advocating for its prohibition in classrooms. This stance has sparked discussions on gender equality, Islamic integration, and the secular nature of public education, raising concerns about stigmatizing and alienating Muslim communities.

Read also:

Latest