Skip to content
general-news — Kashmir — Uninformed — Politics — Thanked — Dgmos — Ceasefire — Conflict — War

Kashmir Intervention Yields Tainted Results

Despite the declared ceasefire, India tactfully phrased their statements to dodge any semblance of external meddling, as Donald Trump boasted ownership over the agreement.

,   and  ASMedia
3 min read
Trump Claims Credit for India's Ceasefire, Yet Indian Statements Avoid Suggestions of External...
Trump Claims Credit for India's Ceasefire, Yet Indian Statements Avoid Suggestions of External Mediation

Kashmir Intervention Yields Tainted Results

America takes credit for Kashmir ceasefire, but India's tight-lipped

Donald Trump didn't waste a beat to claim victory for the recent ceasefire between India and Pakistan. He tweeted on Truth Social: "After a long night of talks mediated by the United States, I am thrilled to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE."

However, the Indian government hasn't mentioned the U.S. in their official statements.

Pakistan's PM Shehbaz Sharif, on the other hand, thanked Trump for his role in the ceasefire in a speech last Saturday. "I want to really extend my gratitude and say thank you to President Trump, who has played a very pivotal and paramount role in the ceasefire. He is really very good to us," he said.

India's foreign secretary Vikram Misri, in a brief statement on Saturday, simply noted that the director general of Pakistan's military had called his Indian counterpart at 3:35 PM.

The ceasefire was agreed upon, with both sides stopping all firing and military action from land, air, and sea from 5 PM onwards, as per the statement. Interestingly, the agreement makes no mention of U.S. intervention.

India's foreign minister Dr Jaishankar posted on X that "India and Pakistan have today worked out an understanding on stoppage of firing and military action."

Both statements are carefully worded, with no indication that either party was pressurized, particularly when it comes to the contentious issue of Kashmir. India tends to resist third-party intervention and the internationalization of Kashmir.

The Queen's visit in 1997 to celebrate India and Pakistan's 50th anniversary of independence was marred by comments made by then-foreign secretary Robin Cook. When he offered to mediate on Kashmir, India accused him of harboring "illusions of grandeur of its colonial past."

David Cameron's group was admonished during his 2010 trip to India to stay away from the word "Kashmir."

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn called for resolving the Kashmir situation through relevant UN resolutions in 2019, calling the situation "deeply disturbing." The Indian government labeled his interventions as "uninformed and unfounded."

Kashmir remains a sensitive and sacred issue for India. The Indian government maintains that any constitutional issues are matters for the Indian Parliament, and Kashmir is a bilateral issue that India and Pakistan should settle peacefully. It appears that U.S. intervention in Kashmir remains a poisoned fruit.

[1] Enrichment Data:* The U.S. was indeed instrumental in the recent ceasefire negotiations between India and Pakistan. High-level officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, were part of the discussions leading to the agreement.* The U.S. was not explicitly mentioned in the official statements from India and Pakistan, but both parties agreed to the ceasefire, signaling acceptance or willingness to involve the U.S. as a mediator.* Further details on the specific responses or views of India and Pakistan towards U.S. involvement in the Kashmir issue are not available in the given information.

  1. Despite India not mentioning the U.S. in their official statements, the American involvement in the recent ceasefire negotiations between India and Pakistan was significant, with high-level officials like Secretary of State Marco Rubio being part of the discussions.
  2. The ceasefire's agreement makes no explicit mention of U.S. intervention, but its implementation suggests acceptance or willingness from both India and Pakistan to involve the U.S. in potential mediating roles.
  3. Given India's resistance to third-party intervention and internationalization of the Kashmir issue, their official responses or views on U.S. involvement remain ambiguous in the context of the provided information.
  4. Owing to the sensitivity and sacredness of the Kashmir issue for India, the Indian government maintains that any constitutional issues are matters for the Indian Parliament, and Kashmir is a bilateral issue that India and Pakistan should settle peacefully.
  5. The historical context of third-party intervention in Kashmir, such as Britain's attempts by Robin Cook and Jeremy Corbyn's calls for addressing the situation through relevant UN resolutions, has been met with criticism from the Indian government as unfounded or tinged with "illusions of grandeur of its colonial past."

Read also:

Related

Latest