Skip to content
general-news — Osnabrück — Politics — Constitutional — Wouldn — Bannability — Study

Justice Minister Advocates for Prohibition of AfD Party

Scholar advocates for prohibition of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as per constitutional grounds.

,   and  ASMedia
3 min read
Legal professional Hermann Heußner from Osnabrück advocates for the commission of an expert review,...
Legal professional Hermann Heußner from Osnabrück advocates for the commission of an expert review, aimed at determining whether to ban the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

Scholar advocates for prohibition of Alternative for Germany (AfD) political party under the constitution. - Justice Minister Advocates for Prohibition of AfD Party

Let's cut the crap and dive right in!

Legal scholar Hermann Heußner of Osnabrück University suggests that the German government should consider a study on the potential banning of the AfD (Alternative for Germany). According to Heußner, such a study could provide clarity on the party's nature and its compatibility with the German constitution.

The federal government, or the new majority in the Bundestag, could initiate this study should they deem it necessary. Given the latest assessment by the Constitutional Protection, such a study, asserts Heußner, would be especially timely.

Heußner, a specialist in defensive democracy, believes that, given the AfD's status as the largest opposition force in the Bundestag, it's never too late for a party ban. He reference-yells, "If the NSDAP had been banned in 1932, they wouldn't have been able to participate in the Reichstag elections, preventing Hitler's rise to power!"

Some federal states are considering scrutinizing AfD sympathizers in public service, particularly civil servants, judges, and soldiers. Heußner emphasizes that these individuals should uphold the framework of the constitution through their behavior. If the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution considers the federal AfD right-wing extremist, it raises questions about the loyalty of its members to the German constitution. However, each individual must be judged on their actions, stresses Heußner.

The Long Road to a Ban

Let me give you the lowdown on the nitty-gritty of the ban process for political parties under German law.

Grounds for a Ban

You've got to recall Article 21(2) of the German Basic Law. This gem sets the stage for banning parties whose aims or actions threaten or intend to undermine the democratic order.

Steps to a Ban

  1. Observation and Classification The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution keeps a keen eye on suspicious parties, and, in the case of the AfD, has labeled them as "confirmed right-wing extremists."
  2. Filing an Application with the Federal Constitutional Court
  3. Here's where the legal BS starts: The government, the federal parliament (Bundestag), or the federal council (Bundesrat) can file an application to have the party banned.
  4. The court must thoroughly review the application to determine if the party's goals or behavior contradicts the democratic order.
  5. Judicial Review
  6. The court then spends buckets of time examining the case, hearing testimonies, and analyzing evidence before ruling on the party's constitutional status.
  7. A ruling in favor of the ban leads to the party being dissolved and their activities coming to a screeching halt.

The Current Situation

  • Recent Developments: With the AfD being classified as extremist, the groundwork for a ban is being laid.
  • Sizzling Hot Debate: There's a hot old debate raging about whether or not to initiate ban proceedings, with Chancellor Olaf Scholz cautioning that it should be approached with caution and justification.
  • Freedom of Speech Fights: The AfD is already contesting the BfV's actions in court, claiming they're being denied basic rights.

The Winding Road to a Ban: At a Glance

| Step | Responsible Body | Key Action ||-------------------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------|| Monitoring & Classification | BfV (Federal Office) | Classifies party || Application to Court | Government, Bundestag, Bundesrat | Files ban application|| Judicial Review | Federal Constitutional Court | Examines case, issues ruling |

The Hard Sell: Pros and Cons

  • High Legal Threshold: The bar for banning a party is intentionally high to protect democracy and political pluralism.
  • Political and Social Impact: Attempting to ban a major party could have significant repercussions for the German democracy.
  • Legal Recourse: The party being considered for a ban has the right to challenge the process in court.
  • Legal scholar Hermann Heußner suggests the AfD's potential banning should be studied, as it could uphold the democratic order in EC countries like Germany.
  • If the AfD, currently the largest opposition force in the Bundestag, is found to contradict the German constitution, public servants such as civil servants, judges, and soldiers might face scrutiny.
  • The process of banning a political party in Germany, as per Article 21(2) of the German Basic Law, involves observation, filing an application with the Federal Constitutional Court, and thorough judicial review.
  • In the case of the AfD, being classified as right-wing extremist by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, the groundwork for a potential ban is being established, initiating a sizzling hot debate on the political and social impacts.

Read also:

Related

Latest