Skip to content

Judge selection process sought by Woidke

Controversy surrounding attorney Brosius-Gersdorf in the Union leads to delay in the voting for three candidates for Constitutional Court judges in the Bundestag.

Judge appointments seek revision by Woidke
Judge appointments seek revision by Woidke

Judge selection process sought by Woidke

Germany's Constitutional Court Appointment Deadlock Deepens

A political impasse over the appointment of judges to Germany's Federal Constitutional Court has intensified, with Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservative coalition embroiled in a heated dispute. The controversy stems from the nomination of constitutional law expert Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, who faces allegations of plagiarism and a contentious debate on abortion rights within the Union (the conservative bloc).

Brandenburg's Minister President Dietmar Woidke has called for all parties involved to reach an agreement, suggesting the inclusion of the opposition parties, excluding the AfD, early on. Woidke, who proposes a fresh start to the procedure for filling three vacancies at the Federal Constitutional Court, finds it unclear why a qualified candidate has been discredited by some parts of the CDU/CSU.

The SPD has proposed Brosius-Gersdorf as an alternative candidate, while the Union has nominated federal labor court judge Günther Spinner. However, the SPD's proposal has met with resistance within the Union, particularly regarding Spinner's perceived conservative stance.

Alexander Hoffmann, CSU parliamentary group leader, has suggested putting together a new judicial package, which has met with resistance from the SPD and the Greens. Woidke believes it is necessary for the factions in the Bundestag to quickly find a way out of the deadlocked dispute and submit a solution proposal.

The election of three judges for the Federal Constitutional Court was removed from the Bundestag's agenda on July 11 due to resistance within the Union faction. The deadlock has escalated into a significant political crisis, exposing serious divisions within the coalition just months after Merz assumed office.

The controversy surrounding Brosius-Gersdorf’s nomination has caused an unprecedented state of uncertainty for Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court, as the political standoff prevents the court from functioning normally. The court, which plays a crucial role in upholding the country's constitution, has been left in a state of limbo, with three vacancies still unfilled.

Woidke, who holds the chair for Public Law, with a focus on Constitutional Law and Social Law, at the University of Potsdam since 2021, has proposed a radical solution. In his view, the only way out is for all candidates to withdraw and for the factions in the German Bundestag to completely restart this procedure.

References: 1. Bundesverfassungsgericht: Streit um die Nominierung von Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf 2. Bundesverfassungsgericht: Streit um die Nominierung von Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf 3. Bundesverfassungsgericht: Streit um die Nominierung von Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf

The policy-and-legislation surrounding the appointment of judges to Germany's Federal Constitutional Court is currently at the center of politics, as a contentious dispute continues between Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservative coalition and other parties. This general-news story has brought the issue of policy-and-legislation into the spotlight, with the nomination of constitutional law expert Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf and the controversy over her alleged plagiarism and stance on abortion rights being the focal point.

Read also:

    Latest