Skip to content

Jew-haters smear the Ministry of Justice

Jew-haters smear the Ministry of Justice

Jew-haters smear the Ministry of Justice
Jew-haters smear the Ministry of Justice

Unveiling the Anti-Semitic Stain in Saxony-Anhalt's Ministry of Justice

Magdeburg - The Ministry of Justice in Saxony-Anhalt finds itself embroiled in an unpleasant scandal, with anti-Semitic sentiments rearing their ugly head. The graffiti of a derogatory anti-Israel slogan was discovered on a wall in a conference room.

The ministry confirmed the incident to dpa on Tuesday, following an inquiry. They reported that a police report was promptly filed upon learning of the incident.

According to a spokesperson, the police had indeed been notified of "anti-Semitic graffiti" on November 11. Immediate investigations were launched, and proceedings were initiated on suspicion of incitement to hatred. "The investigation is still ongoing," the spokesperson added.

The exact wording of the anti-Semitic slur remains unclear. The conference room in question is a common area with access granted to many individuals.

In response, the ministry has taken steps to increase awareness among staff and revised access regulations for office buildings, including scrutiny of third-party access.

Justice Minister Franziska Weidinger (CDU) recently emphasized the importance of combating all forms of anti-Semitism and the glorification of terrorist violence. She asserted, "Hatred against Jews and any questioning of the right of the state of Israel to exist are not tolerable in our society.", negating the hate speech targeted towards Israel.

The presence of anti-Semitic graffiti in the Ministry of Justice's conference room has sparked concern among regional political circles. Though reported to the police on November 11, the Ministry opted against a public acknowledgment of the incident.

Reasons for Private Handling

Law enforcement and investigative agencies often require time to gather evidence, interview witnesses, and conduct thorough investigations before making public statements. This process can span several days or even weeks.

Furthermore, reporting such incidents to the public can be sensitive, especially if the investigation is ongoing. Authorities might wish to avoid premature disclosure that could compromise their investigation or incite further violence.

Moreover, there may be policies and protocols in place, which dictate when and how such information is released to the public, ensuring that the release of information is strategic and does not jeopardize the investigation.

In addition, authorities may choose to handle the situation delicately to avoid inciting unnecessary panic or harm to the community, especially if the incident hasn't garnered widespread attention. Lastly, law enforcement agencies often follow media guidelines that dictate how and when information is released to the public, ensuring responsible communication.

Without specific details from the Saxony-Anhalt Ministry of Justice or local police department, determining the precise reason for minimal public disclosure is challenging. However, these factors represent common considerations in such scenarios.

Latest