Israel's ruling government decides to remove the Attorney General - Is the nation's democracy under threat?
In a dramatic turn of events, Israel's government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has voted unanimously to dismiss Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara. However, the Supreme Court has stepped in to block this move, maintaining Baharav-Miara's authority and preventing the government from appointing a replacement[1][2].
The decision to dismiss Baharav-Miara, who is currently prosecuting Netanyahu for corruption, has been met with immediate resistance from the judiciary. The Supreme Court issued an injunction, stating that the procedure for firing the attorney general was inappropriate[1]. As a result, Baharav-Miara continues to hold her position, and the government is barred from appointing a replacement.
The case is now before the High Court of Justice, which will hear petitions against the dismissal. An expanded panel of nine justices has been scheduled for a hearing in the following month[3]. Petitioners argue that the government circumvented existing oversight mechanisms, undermining the attorney general’s independence by turning the dismissal into a political act.
This unprecedented attempt to remove an attorney general threatens a significant constitutional and democratic precedent in Israel. It raises concerns about the erosion of judicial independence and the rule of law. The government’s move appears politically motivated to protect Netanyahu amid his corruption prosecution and investigations into his advisers[1].
The Supreme Court’s intervention highlights a robust judicial check on executive overreach. However, the final outcome will depend on the Court’s ruling on the legality and constitutionality of the dismissal process.
NZZ.ch would like to remind its users that our important functions require JavaScript to be enabled. We advise you to adjust your settings accordingly to ensure a seamless browsing experience.
[1] Haaretz (2023). Israel's Supreme Court blocks government move to dismiss Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara. Retrieved from https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israel-s-supreme-court-blocks-government-move-to-dismiss-attorney-general-gali-baharav-miara-1.109977576
[2] The Times of Israel (2023). Supreme Court blocks government from firing Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara. Retrieved from https://www.timesofisrael.com/supreme-court-blocks-government-from-firing-attorney-general-gali-baharav-miara/
[3] The Jerusalem Post (2023). Petitioners argue government circumvented oversight mechanisms in Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara's dismissal. Retrieved from https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/legal-affairs/article-706708
- The petitioners claim that the government's move to dismiss Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, which appears politically motivated, directly challenges the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law, marking a significant issue within policy-and-legislation and general-news.
- The Supreme Court's intervention in the dismissal of Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara indicates the strength of the judicial check on executive overreach, making it a topic of interest in politics and a critical point in policy-and-legislation.
