Skip to content

Is Trump capable of compelling Putin toward a peaceful resolution?

Trump and Putin aim to address the Russian aggressive actions towards Ukraine in a summit, yet the Kiev leadership maintains a distance from the discussions

Is Trump capable of compelling Putin to negotiate peace?
Is Trump capable of compelling Putin to negotiate peace?

Is Trump capable of compelling Putin toward a peaceful resolution?

On August 15, 2025, the highly anticipated meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin took place in Anchorage, Alaska, at the military base Elmendorf-Richardson. The summit, the first since Trump's return to office, was centered around the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. However, the meeting ended without any formal agreement.

Key Points from the Summit

No Territorial Concessions Agreed

Contrary to some fears, no deal was reached that would pressure Ukraine to cede land, avoiding the worst-case scenario. This was a relief for many, particularly Ukrainian politicians, who believe that Ukraine may ultimately have to acknowledge losses for peace with Russia, but a legally binding territorial concession is currently unthinkable.

Exclusion of Allies

Ukraine and its European allies were notably absent from the talks, highlighting their exclusion from discussions about their own future and European security. This exclusion has raised concerns among European leaders, who fear that the summit's direction may undermine their interests.

Alignment with Putin's Narrative

Trump expressed views that partially aligned with Putin’s narrative, attributing the conflict’s roots to Ukraine’s westward integration and diminishing Russian influence in Eastern Europe. This stance has raised concerns among European leaders who fear a shift in US policy under Trump, urging Ukraine and Europe to negotiate with Russia, potentially at Ukraine’s expense.

Potential Delay in Sanctions

Trump indicated a potential delay in imposing tougher sanctions on Russia, signaling a softer U.S. stance that could affect support for Ukraine and European security. This shift in tone has raised concerns among European leaders, who are worried about the potential impact on their interests and the leverage that the US may shift in ways unfavorable to Ukraine and its allies.

The Road Ahead

The summit in Alaska did not produce concrete agreements, but it signaled a possible shift in US policy under Trump towards urging Ukraine and Europe to negotiate with Russia, potentially at Ukraine’s expense. This development has raised concerns among many European and Ukrainian stakeholders, who are closely watching the evolving situation to understand its implications for the future of the Ukrainian conflict and European security.

[1] CNN. (2025, August 16). Trump suggests Ukraine should cede territory to Russia to achieve peace. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/16/politics/trump-putin-summit-ukraine-ceasefire/index.html

[2] BBC News. (2025, August 16). Trump-Putin summit: What was agreed – and what wasn't. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58488442

The summit marked a potential shift in U.S. policy toward suggesting Ukraine and Europe negotiate with Russia, a move that partially aligns with Putin’s narrative and could impact the future of the Ukrainian conflict and European security. In the absence of a legally binding territorial concession, Ukraine and its European allies were excluded from the talks, raising concerns about the direction of discussions and their potential impact on European security.

Read also:

    Latest