Two Opinions on "Lumumba": Is It Racist or Just a Christmas Tradition?
The term "Lumumba" stirred controversy when it was used to name a hot cocoa drink served at German Christmas markets. This name originates from Patrice Lumumba, a Congolese politician who fought against exploitation and ultimately lost his life in controversial circumstances. Two German journalists, Frank Klauss and Kai Feldhaus, have differing views on whether the name is racist.
Frank Klauss: "Lumumba" is Racist
Klauss strongly disagrees with using the name "Lumumba" for a cocoa drink. He believes it degrades Patrice Lumumba and represents all Africans who advocate for their rights and dignity. According to him, even if the name was initially intended as a tribute, pointing out the ex-politician's murder is insensitive and makes it racist, even if the choice was unintentional.
Kai Feldhaus: "Lumumba" is Not Racist
Feldhaus argues that people in the Democratic Republic of Congo have many issues to be angry about. He acknowledges that the use of Patrice Lumumba's name could seem inappropriate, but dismisses claims that it is racist. Feldhaus emphasizes that "Lumumba" is a traditional Spanish drink with no direct translation to German, and by calling its name "dead aunt," it would nonetheless be discriminatory in its own right.
Historical and Cultural Context
The naming controversy raises questions around colonialism, racism, and the legacy of Belgium's colonial rule in Africa. The use of Lumumba's name without due understanding and respect for Congolese culture and history could be perceived as cultural appropriation.
In summary, though the term "Lumumba" may not be inherently racist, using it without proper sensitivity towards the historical significance and cultural context could be insensitive and thus, problematic.
