Skip to content
crime-and-justice — Strasbourg — Politics — Rape — Considers — Decryption — General-news

International Human Rights Court Criticizes France for Inadequate Protection of Three Minors Victims of Rape Incident

France falls short in executing a penal system sufficiently punishing non-consensual sexual acts, according to court, aligning with jurisprudence and international standards.

,   and  ASMedia
5 min read

European Court Slams France for Mishandling Rape Cases Involving Minors

International Human Rights Court Criticizes France for Inadequate Protection of Three Minors Victims of Rape Incident

It's bloomin' scandalous! The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), based in Strasbourg, has blasted France for poor handling of rape cases involving youngsters. On April 24th, the ECtHR condemned France for allowing a scenario known as "secondary victimization" to occur, which particularly affected three underage victims who had reported rapes1.

This courtroom debacle comes as we delve into the complexities of consent in the law and the fiery debate it sparks2. Findings reveal that in each of the three cases, the French justice system botched its duty to shield the victims during a period when they were 13, 14, and 16 years old1.

So, what went wrong, you ask? The courts didn't bother to pay attention to the specifics, including alcohol consumption and the consent of the teenagers, who found themselves in an exceptionally vulnerable position. Two of these cases also had alarming delays and lack of urgency in the criminal proceedings1.

The ECtHR's fiery verdict has sparked outrage, with more than a few calling it a wake-up call for France1. According to Julie's attorney, Emmanuel Daoud, the ECtHR is making it crystal clear that French jurisdictions cannot shun victims—and especially not underage ones—in such a miserably disrespectful manner1.

The ECtHR's blunt verdict calls out the gender stereotypes employed by French judges, damning them as archaic and demoralizing for the victims1. By sitting back and allowing comments like these in the courtroom, these minors were subjected to embarrassing and belittling comments that only served to further victimize them and crush their faith in justice1.

The drama doesn't stop there, as another applicant reported rapes committed by men in their twenties, and a third one attested to a rape by an 18-year-old man at her home1. Despite their attempts to seek justice, they received no satisfaction1.

The ECtHR reminds us all that consent must truly reflect a free and unhesitant intention to participate in a sexual act at the moment in question1. Our legal systems should be designed to penalize non-consensual sexual acts effectively1. The stakes are high, especially when it comes to supporting our youngsters who find themselves in the unimaginable position of fighting back against appalling crime.

In a surprising move, France will now cough up a sizable sum in damages: 25,000 euros to Julie and 15,000 euros to each of the other two applicants1. As we watch this unfold, let's remind ourselves that the rights and well-being of all citizens—regardless of age—must always be our top priority.

For more on the dark realities of minor sexual violence, check out this heartbreaking report on our site3. Don't be left in the dark, subscribe now to stay ahead of the curve and make a difference!

  1. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg has recently considered the decryption of France's policy-and-legislation regarding rape cases, particularly those involving minors, following its condemnation of France for poor handling of such cases.
  2. Politics and general news outlets are reporting that the ECtHR has highlighted a case of "secondary victimization" that affected three underage victims who reported rapes in France, which was allegedly mishandled by the French justice system.
  3. Strasbourg's firm stance on the matter has sparked controversy in the realm of crime-and-justice, particularly the ongoing debate about consent and the specifics of the court proceedings in the mentioned cases.
  4. As a result, France has been urged to reconsider its policy-and-legislation concerning the handling of rape cases involving minors, especially given the ECtHR's emphasis on the importance of protecting these vulnerable individuals.
  5. Furthermore, the ECtHR's verdict has raised attention to the broader issue of minor sexual violence in society, prompting calls for improved policymaking and stronger legal protections for children and young adults.
International Court calls out France for neglecting duties; ought to establish a penal system to punish non-consensual sexual acts, stressed the Court, in line with national law and global standards.
France has been admonished for not meeting its obligations to implement a judicial system capable of punishing non-consensual sexual acts, as per its own case law and international standards.
France's judicial system falls short in implementing penalties for non-consensual sexual acts, not meeting the standards set by its own jurisprudence and international norms, the court cautioned.
Non-consensual sexual acts have gone unpunished in France, as per the court's argument, due to the nation's inability to enforce an adequate penal system, a shortcoming which contradicts international standards and its own judicial precedents.
France fell short in establishing an adequate penal system, as required by domestic jurisprudence and international norms, to properly punish non-consensual sexual acts.
France has neglected its legal responsibilities, as dictated by domestic law and international norms, to enforce a penal code that appropriately penalizes non-consented sexual acts.
France is held accountable for not upholding its commitments set by domestic court rulings and international standards, as its penal system allegedly fails to adequately penalize non-consensual sexual acts.
France fell short in implementing a penal system that adequately punishes non-consensual sexual acts, the Court reiterated.
France allegedly fell short in implementing a penal system to punish non-consensual sexual acts, a shortcoming that the Court highlighted as a violation of both domestic and international legal standards.
France has neglected to uphold its mandatory commitments, as per its own judicial precedents and international norms, thereby failing to enforce a penal system adequately to prevent non-consensual sexual acts.
France allegedly neglected its legal responsibility to implement and enforce a penal system that can adequately penalize non-consensual sexual acts, according to the court's observations, falling short of its domestic law and international standards.
France allegedly neglected its legal duties by not establishing a criminal justice system adept at punishing non-consensual sexual acts, as dictated by domestic jurisprudence and international norms, according to the court's assertion.
France fell short in fulfilling its obligations, as per the court's judgment, which necessitated an efficient penal system to penalize non-consensual sexual acts, aligning with its domestic jurisprudence and international standards.
France is being criticized for not effectively enforcing penalties for non-consensual sexual acts, allegedly not meeting its legal obligations as outlined by past court rulings and international norms.
France falls short in implementing a penal system that justly penalizes non-consented sexual acts, contrary to its judicial precedents and international norms.
France is once again deemed to have missed its duty, as per court judgement, due to its inability to enforce a penal system that can punish non-consensual sexual acts, mandated by domestic and international laws.
France has allegedly fallen short in enforcing a penal system capable of prosecuting and penalizing non-consensual sexual acts, as mandated by domestic law and international norms, the court stated.
France failed to meet its positive obligations in creating a penal system that effectively prevents non-consensual sexual acts, according to the court's assertion, based on its own case law and international norms.
France has been criticized for not appropriately enforcing legal penalties on non-consensual sexual acts, as required by its own legal framework and global standards, according to the court's recent statement.
France has been admonished for not effectively enforcing a penal system to punish non-consensual sexual acts, as mandated by their own legal precedents and international norms.
France neglected to meet its duty-bound obligations, which entailed establishing a penal system that effectively suppresses non-consensual sexual acts, consistent with judicial trends and international standards.
France is admonished for failing to implement an effective penal system to punish non-consensual sexual acts, as mandated by domestic law and international norms, the court highlighted.
France failed to meet its commitments, as per court judgement, by not establishing an effective penal system to punish non-consensual sexual acts, drawing upon its own jurisprudence and international standards. This was reemphasized by the court.
France falls short in enforcing penal laws severe enough to penalize non-consensual sexual acts, as mandated by its domestic law and international norms, the Court pointed out.
France is called out for falling short in implementing a penal system capable of punishing non-consensual sexual acts, as per court judgements and international standards.
France fell short in meeting its obligatory standards, the court stated, as per its own jurisprudence and international norms. This shortcoming was linked to the country's inability to implement a penal system that could appropriately punish non-consensual sexual offenses.
France did not fulfill its obligation, as per court rulings and international standards, to establish an operative penal system capable of prosecuting non-consensual sexual acts, the court underscored.
France fell short in implementing its obligatory measures, as per rulings from its jurisdiction and international norms. The court emphasized that an effective penal system is essential in preventing non-consensual sexual acts, but France has not managed to achieve this.
France did not succeed in fulfilling its duty to establish an effective penal system to penalize acts of non-consensual sex, as demanded by its judicial precedents and international norms.
France has allegedly neglected its commitment to institute an effective penal system, sternly enforcing penalties for non-consensual sexual acts, contrary to its judicial precedents and worldwide standards, the Court pointed out.
France allegedly neglected its duty to enforce a penal system adequate for punishing non-consenting sexual acts, as per the court, in accordance with its own judgments and international norms. The court reiterated this point.
France fell short in meeting its obligatory duties, as per its domestic case law and international norms, by failing to establish a penal system capable of handling non-consensual sexual acts effectively.
France has been criticized for its inadequate penal system in handling non-consensual sexual acts, contradicting its own jurisprudence and international norms, according to the Court's recent reminder.
France has neglected to meet its binding commitments, as mandated by its judicial rulings and international norms, by ineffectively enforcing a penal code that appropriately punishes non-consensual sexual acts, the court underlined.
France has neglected to uphold its legal commitments, as per domestic jurisprudence and international norms, by failing to establish an effective penal system that can penalize non-consensual sexual acts.
France fell short in establishing an adequate penal system to deter non-consensual sexual acts, as per its court and international standards, the reminder emphasized.
France fell short in upholding its duty to establish an effective penal system that could punish non-consensual sexual acts, according to the court, due to a lack of compliance with domestic jurisprudence and international standards.
International Court highlights France's failure to establish a penal system adequately punishing non-consensual sexual acts, as per established jurisprudence and international standards.
France fell short in enforcing a penal system efficient enough to impose punishment for non-consenting sexual acts, contrary to its legal precedents and international norms.
France Neglected to Enforce an Efficient Penal System for Punishing Non-Consensual Sexual Acts, as Required by Both Domestic Law and International Standards.
France neglected its duty, as dictated by domestic law and international norms, to establish a penal system capable of punishing instances of non-consensual sexual acts, the court highlighted.
France has been criticized for its inability to enforce a penal system that adequately penalizes non-consensual sexual acts, according to its jurisprudence and international standards.

Read also:

Related

Latest