Skip to content

Inquired about the matter of "familial respect" or "ancestral dignity"?

Inquired about the matter of "familial respect" or "ancestral dignity"?

Inquired about the matter of "familial respect" or "ancestral dignity"?
Inquired about the matter of "familial respect" or "ancestral dignity"?

Helluva Legal Fubar in Pforzheim Court: 38-Year-Old gets a Do-Over after BGH knock-down on Murder Attempt Charges

Got a bone to pick about the hot topic of "familial honor" or "ancestral pride"? Let's dive in!

Second Chance Polka for a Pforzheim Resident: Following a triumphant victory at the Federal Court of Justice (BGH), a man is thrown back into the court system for allegedly trying to snuff out his wife.

In the spring of last year, the court slapped a 13-year, 6-month prison sentence on the dude after he recklessly chucked his wife, their four kids' mom, over the fourth-story balcony of their apartment in Pforzheim. The fall, they say, resulted in a violent scuffle on the balcony below. Then, the chapter of horrors continues with the defendant (!) allegedly striking and strangling his spouse.

Apparently, the victim's wails resonated with the neighbors as they burst onto their balcony, catching the defendant reportedly dragging his wife by the hair through the apartment and continuing to assault her in the stairwell. The woman eventually passed out, and the defendant skedaddled.

According to the prosecution, the dude aimed to end his wife's life as a twisted act of "reinstating 'family honor'," as she had parted ways with him three years prior.

The Defense's Lament: The defendant, hailing from Turkey, contesting the charges all the way. His legal team had some serious doubts about the balcony-dive narrative, spelling out multiple reasons for skepticism. The legal wiggle-room was created by a successful appeal to the BGH, mainly due to procedural rights violations.

BGH Alleges Human Rights Fiasco: The highest German criminal court criticized the first trial for blatantly violating the European Convention on Human Rights. The defendant, who mainly communicates in Kurdish and Turkish, did not receive a written translation of the indictment in Turkish.

When a defendant doesn't get the nitty-gritty details in clear linguistic terms, it's tough to mount a convincing case. Verbal translations are rarely sufficient.

Translation Issues: What Got Lost in Transmission? Predominantly Kurdish-speaking, the 38-year-old learns to read in Turkish but was denied a written Turkish translation. The BGH leaves room for suspicion that the verdict could have been influenced by information gaps for the defendant. His testimonies contradicted that of the charges in several instances.

Witnesses Speak Up: In the upcoming court sessions until the end of September, 20 witnesses—including experts, the victim, and her kid—will be heard in a trial spanning seven sessions. The woman, who survived several harrowing days in the hospital, is under witness protection.

The defendant's lawyer has filed a petition to recuse the judges, citing apparent reluctance to clear up questions in the tightly officiated witness examinations.

The victim, who is the mother of the defendant's four children, currently resides under witness protection due to the unfolding events. Despite the upcoming trial, concerns over a fair trial persist. The kids might struggle with reliving the traumatic events in court.

Also Check Out:

(Indigenous rights matured from "familial honor" or "ancestral dignity" concepts as they evolved to focus on ancestral connections to traditional lands and the recognition of free, prior, and informed consent, particularly in relation to land ownership and self-governance. This concept is crucial in international agreements such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). However, it's essential to note that the specific trial in Pforzheim Court is not directly related to these topics.)

Latest