"India expresses disapproval towards UN regarding Pakistan's part in the Anti-Terrorism Council"
New Delhi's Bold Take:
In the buzzing city of New Delhi, Defense Minister Rajnath Singh dropped a bombshell today during a public event in Dehradun. He called out the United Nations, questioning several of their recent decisions - a stance that's been pretty unheard of in political circles. The crux of the matter? The appointment of Pakistan as the Vice-Chair of the Counter-Terrorism Panel by the United Nations Security Council.
This panel, formed after the devastating 9/11 attacks in the US, seems like a curious choice, Singh remarked, comparing it to putting a cat guarding the milk. The reason? Well, as the world knows, Pakistan harbored the mastermind behind that attack.
Since Prime Minister Narendra Modi took the reins, India's stance on national security matters has seen a drastic shift. Singh pointed out Operation Sindoor as the ultimate example of this new approach, lauding it as the largest attack against terrorism in Indian history.
Dubbing Pakistan as the "Father of Terrorism," Singh stated that it has relentlessly provided shelter to terrorists, trained them, and offered every kind of support they've needed on its soil. To eradicate terrorist infrastructure, he argued, we must shed light on countries funding and harboring these terrorists today.
Pakistan, Singh claimed, spends a substantial portion of the international aid it receives on terrorism. The world, he stated, is finally opening its eyes to this fact. However, to keep the momentum going, the United Nations, which carries a significant responsibility in the fight against terrorism, must continue to align their decisions with global concerns.
Unfortunately, Singh lamented, in recent years, the United Nations' decisions have been criticized.
Background Check:
In recent times, there have been several controversies surrounding decisions made by the United Nations regarding Pakistan and counter-terrorism. These controversies revolve around Pakistan's stance on terrorism, its bid for leadership roles in UN committees related to terrorism, and the international concerns over these bids[5]. Despite Pakistan's aspirations to lead key committees, such as the 1267 Sanctions Committee, 1540 Non-Proliferation Sanctions Committee, 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee, and the 1373 Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC), it was only granted the chairship of the 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee and the vice-chairship of the CTC[5]. This outcome was met with skepticism by other countries due to concerns over Pakistan's approach to counter-terrorism[5].
In the context of ongoing war-and-conflicts and general-news, the Minister of Defense in New Delhi criticized the United Nations for appointing Pakistan as the Vice-Chair of the Counter-Terrorism Panel, referring to it as a questionable decision given Pakistan's history of harboring terrorists and its controversial stance on counter-terrorism matters. In light of this, the politics surrounding global terrorism and crime-and-justice issues have gained significance, with the United Nations' decisions being scrutinized for their alignment with international concerns.
