Independence of SEC from NCAA Could Entail Significant Gamble

Let's Talk About That SEC-NCAA Splitsville Gossip

Last week, Southeastern Conference (SEC) bigwig Greg Sankey dropped a bombshell at the conference's spring meetings by addressing the elephant in the room: the question of why they're still dancing with the NCAA. Now, before you grab your popcorn, let's clarify—Sankey didn't announce a breakup, but he did hint that the idea has been tossed around in high-level conference discussions.

You're probably wondering, "Why on earth would the SEC want to ditch the NCAA?!" Well, the four power conferences, which include the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, and ACC, are eager to beef up their voting power in Division I governance matters. To do this, they're aiming to secure a whopping 68% of the votes, and their relationship with the NCAA is a key factor here.

Mind you, Sankey didn't say the SEC was going to call it quits with the NCAA. He even emphasized that the SEC prefers to stick around. But he did confirm that the possibility of the SEC severing ties with the NCAA has been on the table.

When you think about it, a Power Conference CEO publicly pondering a split is no small deal. So, let's take a closer look at what could go down if the SEC decided to pull the ripcord.

First of all, any conference or school could kiss goodbye to their NCAA membership, if they wanted to. Now, the NCAA might seem like an almighty organization, but it's actually a private, member-driven entity, just like the American Council on Education, the Association of American Law Schools, or even the SEC itself. Members can apply for NCAA membership, and the NCAA has the final say on whether they're approved or not. This means the relationship between the NCAA and its members is, you guessed it, voluntary and agreement-based.

The NCAA also can't force members to do a jig if they don't feel like it. Judge Mack Kidd, the late Texas judge who delivered a memorable smackdown in the NCAA v. Yeo case, said it plain and simple: the NCAA doesn't have the authority to enforce its rules on individuals, and NCAA member institutions can, in fact, secede if they so choose. So, as long as the SEC plays by the rules, it could go solo, with the power to establish its own athlete eligibility rules, NIL policies, transfer rules, and more.

The SEC has the juice to stand on its own two feet. Its member schools are heavy hitters in terms of size, prestige, and endowments, boasting top-notch facilities and a recognizable brand. The SEC has also scored a $3 billion media rights deal with ABC and ESPN, and it consistently ranks at the top in terms of feeding players to the NFL. In short, the SEC's got the clout to operate independently.

But before the SEC busts out the party hats, there are a few things to consider. For one, the SEC would still be on the hook for legal bills if the NCAA faces yet another antitrust lawsuit related to athlete compensation. Plus, severing ties with the NCAA means giving up access to the NCAA's resources, such as academic progress reports, research on athlete health, and championships for non-football, non-basketball sports.

Another challenge would be recreating March Madness, which some argue is the best bracket buster in U.S. sports outside of the Super Bowl. Sure, the SEC could put together its own basketball tourney, and it would likely attract broadcasters, but it might not have the same charm as the big dance.

Finally, there's the question of whether a standalone SEC league or a super league formed with other breakaway conferences would too closely resemble professional sports. After all, the NCAA has argued that consumers are drawn to college sports because they offer a distinctly different vibe from the pros. Fans are interested in collegiate athletes who are striving to earn a degree and not just a big payday.

So, is a separation worth it for the SEC? It's a tricky question with no easy answer. On one hand, the Sec could score greater autonomy, but on the other, it could lose access to valuable resources and risk creating a more professional-feeling product that might turn fans off. Ultimately, it's a decision that would require careful consideration from the SEC and its member schools.

## Bonus Reading:

### The Legal Landscape: More Lawsuits Likely as NCAA Revenue Sharing Increases

The SEC's potential move to leave the NCAA reflects a broader push for autonomy and control in college sports. If the SEC does go it alone, it could signal a significant shift in the authority structure of college athletics. Stay tuned for updates!

An analysis of the potential impact on people's media rights could reveal valuable insights should the Southeastern Conference (SEC) decide to sever ties with the NCAA, as the SEC might establish its own rules for athlete eligibility, Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) policies, transfer rules, and more.
The SEC, with its quality athletic programs and substantial media rights deal, could face complex decisions regarding access to academic resources, championships for non-football, non-basketball sports, and whether to recreate popular events like March Madness should it decide to move away from the NCAA, posing challenges that would require careful deliberation from both the SEC and its member schools.