In certain circumstances, relocation to Afghanistan and Syria for Baerbock could be a possibility.

In certain situations, relocating individuals like Baerbock to Afghanistan or Syria might become a possibility.

As per the current legislation, criminals and suspected individuals do not lose or gain subsidiary protection for committing crimes, clarified Baerbock. She firmly emphasized, "There's no place for murderers and terrorists here, not even for those propagating Islamism, challenging our Constitution, our freedoms, or our lifestyle."

However, Baerbock urged caution when examining specific circumstances. For instance, the case of the suspected attacker in Solingen wasn't about deporting him to his homeland, Syria, but to an EU country like Bulgaria. "The reasons behind its failure need to be explained now," she demanded.

Her party is advocating for revisiting the topic of deporting criminals once more, Baerbock highlighted. What's crucial is ensuring that "individuals who commit heinous crimes here are convicted, serve their time in prison," she stressed.

Politics should also address the predicament of returning individuals who lose their protected status and complete their sentences in countries like Afghanistan and Syria, Baerbock added. However, it's unjustifiable to question the protected status of refugees in general, including "school-going children," she argued against blanket deportation calls.

She supports examining stricter gun laws and granting more authorities to security forces to access information about potential attack planning on social media. "Nobody needs knives or non-household suitable bladed weapons," she stated.

Previously, the FDP has primarily opposed stricter gun laws. However, Federal Justice Minister Marco Buschmann (FDP) supports deporting individuals to Syria. "I believe in deporting individuals to Syria," he said on ARD-"Morning Magazine." A solution for Afghanistan is also needed.

Buschmann criticized the inconsistent implementation of deporting the suspected Solingen attacker to Bulgaria. The Justice Minister also called for a tougher stance against Islamic propaganda on the internet. "I believe that radical influencers who work from Germany should be kicked out sooner," he said to ARD. He believes, "everything that promotes radicalization online must also be countered."

The Commission has proposed revising the rules on deporting criminals, as stated by Baerbock. After serving their prison sentences, individuals who commit heinous crimes in EU countries may face deportation, such as those from Afghanistan or Syria.

Further Reading:

Relevant Enrichment Data:

In the realm of European law, there are ongoing discussions and policies around deporting criminals and individuals who lose their protected status from Afghanistan and Syria.

1. Germany's Deportation Plans:
2. Germany is considering deporting Afghan and Syrian immigrants who are convicted of serious crimes. Interior Minister Nancy Faeser has stated that negotiations are underway to deport individuals convicted of serious crimes, such as murder, through third countries like Uzbekistan[2].
3. However, these plans have faced significant opposition from rights groups and advocates who argue that such deportations could violate asylum-seekers' human rights and international law[2].
4. UK's Asylum Policy:
5. The UK has introduced new asylum rules permitting the refusal of asylum applications if individuals could have reasonably claimed asylum in another safe country. This openness to removing asylum seekers to safe third countries reflects a trend in the UK's immigration policies[4].
6. EU's Migration Policies:
7. The EU has been focusing on improving return policies, including concluding agreements with neighboring and non-EU countries, to manage migration. This includes the use of third countries for deportations and asylum processing[3].
8. Human Rights Concerns:
9. The EU's policies on deportation and asylum processing have been criticized for potential human rights violations. Rights groups argue that outsourcing asylum procedures to third countries may lead to serious human rights abuses[1][2].
10. Syrian Displacement:
11. Returns for Syrian refugees are contingent on resolving numerous political, practical, and legal issues, including significant improvements in security and economic conditions in Syria[3].