Skip to content

Immigration authorities have begun detaining migrants within immigration courts, according to legal representatives.

Federal agents allegedly apprehend migrants during immigration court hearings, even in instances where their deportation cases have been terminated.

Federal authorities are reportedly seizing migrants at immigration courts, even after their...
Federal authorities are reportedly seizing migrants at immigration courts, even after their deportation cases have been dismissed. This practice, as shared by immigration lawyers, raises questions about the legality of such actions.

In a bold move, federal agents are apprehending migrants right at immigration courts, even after their deportation cases have been dismissed. This tactic, endorsed by the Trump administration, aims to speed up the deportation process by bypassing legal proceedings.

Immigration attorneys have been vocal about this issue, reporting courthouse arrests in multiple states and cities over the past two weeks. According to Gregory Zhen, Senior Director of Government Relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, these tactics are not only undermining people's trust in the courts, but also denying them a fair day in court.

After their cases are dismissed, the migrants are subjected to expedited removal proceedings by the Department of Homeland Security. This rapid-fire deportation process often leaves little room for asylum seekers or individuals with legitimate claims to pursue their cases.

Dismissals of cases were once a positive outcome for migrants. However, the Trump administration is now using dismissals as a means to detain people at immigration courts and expedite their removal.

Michelle Brane, the executive director of the immigration support group Together and Free, expressed concern that this approach is unfair, as it denies people the opportunity to fight for their cases. She described it as an attempt to sow fear in immigrant communities, potentially infringing upon their constitutional right to due process.

Videos of these courthouse arrests have circulated on social media, adding to the fear and apprehension among migrants. In San Antonio, Texas, several migrants expressed fear and anxiety about attending hearings. One woman, whose husband was detained, commented, "Damned if you do, damned if you don't. It feels like none of us are safe."

This escalated strategy is part of the Trump administration's broader crackdown on immigration, involving the enforcement of rarely used laws and regulations to speed up deportations. The administration argues that this approach will help alleviate the overburdened immigration court system, improve national security, and reduce government costs. However, criticism and controversy surrounding due process concerns, legal fairness, and accuracy of residency determination remain.

In the context of ongoing immigration debates, videos of courthouse arrests have sparked general-news discussions due to concerns raised by immigration attorneys that these tactics are denying people a fair day in court and undermining trust in the courts. The Trump administration's increased use of dismissals as a means for detaining people at immigration courts is seen as a potentially unfair strategy that infringes upon constitutional right to due process, particularly for those seeking asylum or with legitimate claims.

Read also:

Latest