Skip to content
Crime-and-justice — Stories

ICE discreetly eases enforcement in courthouses

ICE has withdrawn a directive that mandated agents to carry out courthouse arrests in accordance with state and local laws. The agency has chosen not to provide insights on the implications for forthcoming law enforcement actions.

,   and  ASMedia
3 min read
ICE revokes mandate guaranteeing courthouse arrests align with local and state regulations, leaving...
ICE revokes mandate guaranteeing courthouse arrests align with local and state regulations, leaving unclear implications for future operations. The agency remains silent on the potential ramifications.

ICE discreetly eases enforcement in courthouses

Loose Cannon Law enforcement:

ICE's Shaky Stance on State and Local Laws

In a move that's bound to heap more controversy onto the immigration debate, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has backpedaled on its own advice to its agents, advising them to disregard state and local laws during courthouse raids. This policy shift could lead to an uptick in legal disputes and, potentially, a surge in enforcement tactics that some deem as excessive.

The latest policy guidelines, posted on ICE's website, show the agency's attempt to empower its frontline agents to make arrests in and around courthouses - a move that's part of the Trump administration's broader strategy to round up immigrants across the nation and its territories. This unprecedented policy change has yet to make headlines.

Robust ICE operations, which have stirred up protests and heated discussions in recent weeks, have brought the issue of local autonomy and governance to the forefront. Arrests made at courthouses, often culminating in public altercations, have sparked fears that these actions might threaten the democratic process of law enforcement within communities and further blur the lines between civil and criminal enforcement.

Incidentally, the change in guidelines comes hot on the heels of high-profile ICE arrests at court hearings, as part of the administration's mission to carry out what Trump refers to as the largest deportation campaign in American history. The previous policy, issued in January, instructed ICE agents to ensure that courthouse arrests did not violate local laws. The new policy, however, scraps that requirement, leaving it up to each officer to decipher the complex legal challenges that may arise during these operations.

"The old policy required ICE to consult with a legal adviser to determine whether making an arrest at or near a courthouse might violate a nonfederal law. The new policy eliminates that requirement," explains Anthony Enriquez, vice president at RFK Human Rights, a human rights advocacy nonprofit. "Now, these frequently complex legal questions fall to the judgment of a line officer untrained in local laws."

Emma Winger, deputy legal director at the American Immigration Council, agrees with this assessment. "It is certainly yet another effort to unleash and expand ICE's enforcement operations without regard to state law," she adds.

Although federal policy guidelines may not carry the weight of the law, they do act as a sort of rulebook for ICE agents, dictating procedures to be followed during enforcement operations. Responding to our inquiry, ICE spokesperson Mike Alvarez directed us to the May 27 memorandum. ICE did not provide any clarification on whether they would continue to take local courthouse policies and protocols into account during arrest operations.

The recent policy change takes place amidst a wave of ICE raids across the U.S., some sparking public protests and confrontations with citizens. Notably, the Biden administration had curbed ICE enforcement actions in and around courthouses in 2021, citing concerns that these arrests could lead to a chilling effect on immigrant cooperation with law enforcement[1].

In light of these developments, it's worth noting that ICE traditionally operates under federal authority, sometimes clashing with local jurisdictions that uphold sanctuary policies or have laws limiting cooperation with ICE. As ICE's new policy suggests, increased confrontations between ICE and local authorities could be in the cards.

[1] Biden administration limits ICE enforcement actions in and around courthouses[2] ICE scrapping its own advice to agents about respecting state and local laws[3] New York State sees surge in immigration-related arrests at courthouses

  1. Untrained line officers may now have to grapple with complex legal questions that were previously handled by legal advisers, potentially leading to more legal disputes and enforcements deemed excessive by critics.
  2. The elimination of a requirement to consult with a legal adviser before making arrests at or near courthouses could further blur the lines between civil and criminal enforcement, threatening the democratic process of law enforcement within communities.
  3. In the wake of this policy shift, the general public, particularly those in positions of policy-and-legislation, must stay informed and engaged in discussions about immigration, crime-and-justice, and the role of AI in law enforcement.
  4. The American Immigration Council and RFK Human Rights have expressed concerns that the new policy is another attempt to unleash and expand ICE's enforcement operations without regard to state law, which could lead to increased confrontations between ICE and local authorities who uphold sanctuary policies.
  5. As the Biden administration had previously limited ICE enforcement actions in and around courthouses due to concerns about a chilling effect on immigrant cooperation with law enforcement, the recent policy change may signal a shift back towards the assertion of federal authority over local jurisdictions.

Read also:

Related

Latest