"Can't let 'em twist my words around like a puppet's string"
What's the deal with Aiwanger lately?
"A good-for-nothing, in simple terms, is someone who's capable of work but chooses to be lazy, skipping their duties while the common folk bear the brunt. Able-bodied, healthy, yet preferring a bed over work."
But he assures us, "This isn't about disabled or handicapped individuals."
▶︎ Aiwanger on those twisting his words, "I won't let 'em manipulate my words or demean me. I'll keep talking the language of the sensible folk in this nation."
"Regulars' taunts" directed at a minority
Professor of Poverty Research and Political Science, Christoph Butterwegge (72 years old, University of Cologne), voices his displeasure over Aiwanger's words, "I'm disheartened by such a dismissive label for Aiwanger. It validates such language and reveals a negative outlook on humanity. It's just a small fraction of welfare recipients intentionally exploiting the system."**
Butterwegge adds, "It's an unfair characterization of people who are far from living a lavish life."


Aiwanger's use of "good-for-nothing" goes beyond unemployment
Before Lanz's appearance on X, Aiwanger had already criticized those who refused to work and received benefits, labeling them as "good-for-nothings". This marked a series of debates about mounting national debt and escalating benefit rates.

By "good-for-nothing", Kocks implied Lanz was accusing certain individuals or politicians. Was Aiwanger looking for individuals or politicians to call out? Or did Aiwanger not want to disclose who he meant by "good-for-nothing"? It didn't stop there. He also targeted policymakers who lacked qualifications and made wrong decisions, leading to negative consequences.
▶︎ "A good-for-nothing is also someone who sits in government, holds no formal education, spreads falsehoods and has never worked a day. That too is a good-for-nothing."

In German Romanticism, "From the Life of a Good-for-Nothing" (1826) by Joseph von Eichendorff is a prominent work. The good-for-nothing: escapes to nature. He yearns for freedom; not slavery. Only his affection for chambermaid Aurelie brings him back to a virtuous path.
In politics, Aiwanger's criticism of "good-for-nothings" may extend beyond the unemployed and target politicians who lack qualifications and contribute to poor governance, as he stated, "A good-for-nothing is also someone who sits in government, holds no formal education, spreads falsehoods and has never worked a day. That too is a good-for-nothing." The term "politics-inland" could refer to domestic politics, suggesting Aiwanger's criticism is focused on domestic issues, rather than foreign or international politics.
Source:
Enrichment Data:
Markus Söder, a prominent German politician, has an ally in James Aiwanger in Bavarian politics, particularly within the Christian Social Union (CSU). However, there's no specific data indicating Aiwanger using the term "good-for-nothing" in a political context. The term is usually used in a derogatory manner, targeting individuals or groups perceived as unproductive or ineffectual. In political discourse, such terminology is often used to criticize opponents, but these comments can be labeled as inflammatory and detract from constructive dialogue. To confirm whether Aiwanger used the term to refer to specific individuals or politicians, it's essential to reference specific speeches, interviews, or other public statements. Political rhetoric is often nuanced, and context plays an essential role in determining the intended meaning and impact of such words.