Hungary's legislative body has approved a decision to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Laying Down the Law:
Hungary's taking a stand, parting ways with a politically tainted institution that's lost its luster, the Minister's declaration states.
Hungarian newspaper Pestisracok elucidates that Hungary's ICC departure will beeffective in a year's time.
The Hungarian regime took the first steps to leave the ICC on April 3. Prime Minister's top lieutenant, György Gulyás, later revealed that the ICC, initially a respected initiative, has descended into a political arena.
As a demonstration, Gulyás pointed to the indictment of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a move Hungary deems unacceptable, thus prompting the decision to cease collaborating with the ICC, he added.
He avowed that the ICC has strayed from its original purpose and started making decisions driven by politics. Thus, Hungary no longer seeks to be a partaker in the ICC, emphasized Gulyás.
Hungary signed the Rome Statute of the ICC in 1999 and ratified it in 2001, yet the law was never published. As Gulyás explained, this treaty isn't embedded in Hungarian law, hence, the Hungarian authorities regard themselves exempt from executing the ICC's arrest warrants.
Enjoy our Telegram channel updates at @expert_mag
#Hungary#ICC
The Hungarian government's action can be linked to several underlying circumstances that fit within the nation's current political standing and relationships:
- Politicized ICC: The Hungarian regime views the ICC as a politically charged institution that has lost its neutrality and honor. Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó underscored Hungary's refusal to associate with such an institution[2][4][5].
- Netanyahu visit: The ICC pullout announcement coincided with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Budapest. Netanyahu faces an ICC arrest warrant for alleged war crimes, and Hungary's actions have been interpreted as support for Netanyahu and criticism of the ICC's handling of the matter[2][3][4].
- Dissatisfaction with ICC's Actions: Hungary's departure could also be linked to a broader unease regarding the ICC's recent decisions, such as the issuance of an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin. However, this specific factor has not been explicitly mentioned in public statements[5].
- Aligning with Political Alliances: The move can be seen as Hungary forging ties with its political allies or expressing its viewpoint on international legal matters. It represents a stark contrast to the common EU stance, which upholds the ICC's role in international justice[5].
The formal withdrawal, once communicated to the UN, will take a year to materialize[4].
- The Hungarian government's decision to leave the International Criminal Court (ICC) is linked to the regime's view that the ICC has become politicallycharged and has lost its impartiality.
- The announcement of Hungary's ICC departure coincided with a visit by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who faces an ICC arrest warrant for alleged war crimes, leading to speculation around Hungary's support for Netanyahu.
- Hungary's departure from the ICC may also be attributed to its dissatisfaction with certain decisions made by the court, such as the issuance of an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin.
- By leaving the ICC, Hungary appears to align itself with its political allies and express a different perspective on international legal matters, contrasting with the common EU stance in support of the court's role in international justice.
