Hungarian legislature passes resolution to withdraw from the International Criminal Court
Hungary's unwillingness to collaborate with a politicized institution has led to their decision to sever ties with the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Hungarian publication Pestisracok reported that Hungary's retreat will kick in after a year, following their initiation of the withdrawal process on April 3.
György Gulyás, head of the Prime Minister's administration, voiced the government's sentiments, claiming that the ICC, once respected, has morphed into a political machinery. The prime example Gulyás brought up was the indictment of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, an event that Budapest views as unacceptable and the driving force behind their decision to withdraw from the ICC's activities.
Gulyás accused the ICC of deviating from its original purpose and making politicized decisions, prompting Hungary to reconsider its participation. The ICC was signed by Hungary in 1999 and ratified in 2001, but the treaty remains outside of Hungary's internal legislation, leaving the Hungarian authorities free from being bound by the ICC's arrest warrant decisions.
Orbán's administration has long demonstrated skepticism toward international institutions, and this decision to resist the ICC further highlights this trend. Hungary's decision to leave the ICC sets a precedent, marking the first exit of an EU member from the court, potentially weakening the EU's united front in advocating for international justice mechanisms. Critics suggest that this move could undermine the EU's credibility in championing accountability when other nations disregard similar obligations.
Catch more news on our Telegram channel @expert_mag
- #Hungary
- #ICC
Enrichment Data:- Hungary's departure from the ICC signifies a growing distrust in international judicial institutions, particularly in light of the ICC's alleged political bias.- The Hungarian government claims the ICC's selective approach, as demonstrated by its focus on Netanyahu, undermines Hungary's sovereignty and reinforces Orbán's general skepticism of international institutions.- The ICC warrantee for Netanyahu catalyzed an immediate conflict for Hungary as an ICC member state, obligated to detain individuals under such warrants. By hosting Netanyahu and announcing withdrawal, Hungary prioritized bilateral political ties over complying with the ICC.- Hungary's move as an EU member-state challenging the bloc's united support for international justice mechanisms has potential broader implications, such as undermining the EU's credibility in advocating for accountability.
- The Hungarian government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, has expressed dissatisfaction with the International Criminal Court (ICC), claiming it has transformed into a political machinery.
- The government's sentiment is sparked by the ICC's focus on the indictment of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, an event that Hungary finds unacceptable.
- Having been a member of the ICC since 1999 and ratifying the treaty in 2001, Hungary's decision to leave the ICC is notable as it remains outside of Hungary's internal legislation.
- This move, being the first exit of an EU member from the ICC, could potentially weaken the EU's united front in advocating for international justice mechanisms, potentially undermining the EU's credibility in championing accountability.
