Hollywood Faces Influence from the Trump Administration
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) made a significant move on March 20, 2021, with the publication of an interim final rule titled "Withdrawing the Attorney General's Delegation of Authority." This rule marks a change not seen since 1992, as it could potentially allow federally prohibited persons to petition for the restoration of their Second Amendment rights.
The decision to restore Mel Gibson's gun rights is part of the Trump administration's broader philosophy. The administration believes that if someone has served their sentence and paid their debt and are no longer a threat to themselves or others, their constitutional rights should be restored. This philosophy is not just limited to favoring specific individuals; it extends to a broader effort to restore the rights of individuals who have paid a price and are no longer a danger to the public.
The Gun Control Act (GCA) allows for petitioning to "the Attorney General for relief from the disabilities imposed by Federal laws." Prior to the 1992 appropriations rider, this program was administered by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). However, the rider defunded the ATF's administration of this program, leaving the process in limbo for nearly three decades.
The DOJ, under the Trump administration, has now taken steps to re-establish this process. In April 2021, the Attorney General restored Mel Gibson's gun rights, a notable example of the administration's stance on the matter. Gibson's gun rights were revoked in 2011, and the restoration underscores the administration's commitment to the restoration of constitutional rights.
The interim final rule took immediate effect on March 20 and the DOJ will accept comments on the measure up to June 18. The name of the head of the US Department of Justice potentially responsible for restoring Second Amendment rights, as indicated by the interim final rule, is the Attorney General.
The Trump administration's actions have been met with both support and criticism. On one hand, supporters argue that the administration is giving individuals a second chance and restoring their fundamental rights. On the other hand, critics argue that the administration is taking a dangerous step that could potentially put public safety at risk.
This move by the Trump administration is a significant shift in policy and has sparked a heated debate. As the comments on the interim final rule pour in, it remains to be seen how this change will impact the lives of those seeking to restore their Second Amendment rights.
Read also:
- United States tariffs pose a threat to India, necessitating the recruitment of adept negotiators or strategists, similar to those who had influenced Trump's decisions.
- Weekly happenings in the German Federal Parliament (Bundestag)
- Southwest region's most popular posts, accompanied by an inquiry:
- Discussion between Putin and Trump in Alaska could potentially overshadow Ukraine's concerns
