Skip to content

High Court refuses to hear case filed by teenagers challenging government inaction on climate emergency.

Federal government's response to climate change challenge rejected by Supreme Court, in a move that blocks younger generations' lawsuit aimed at compelling action.

U.S. Supreme Court Displayed in Washington, D.C., on June 29, 2024.
U.S. Supreme Court Displayed in Washington, D.C., on June 29, 2024.

High Court refuses to hear case filed by teenagers challenging government inaction on climate emergency.

Climate Change Lawsuit Dismissed by Supreme Court

In a blow to young climate activists, the Supreme Court on Monday opted not to hear a long-standing case that had been making waves since 2015. The lawsuit, filed by 21 children and teenagers, aimed to force the federal government to tackle climate change through its energy policies.

The lawsuit, known as Juliana v. United States, alleged that the federal government's energy strategies violated the plaintiffs' "fundamental rights" to life, liberty, and more. Despite numerous attempts, the group encountered repeated losses in federal courts.

The main issues at stake were procedural, revolving around whether the group had the legal standing to sue. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled against them, stating they lacked such standing and ordered the dismissal of the case.

In a last-ditch effort, Our Children's Trust, the Oregon-based nonprofit behind the lawsuit, petitioned the Supreme Court to delay its decision until it tackled another case involving post-conviction DNA testing for a Texas death row inmate. The case revolved around the question of whether a party can have standing if a favorable ruling is unlikely to alter the government's course.

However, the Trump administration argued that the suit was "far beyond the type of matter traditionally resolved by 'American courts'" in their written plea to the Supreme Court.

In true Supreme Court fashion, the verdict arrived without any explanation or dissents.

Status Quo:The lawsuit, once a beacon of hope for many climate activists, has effectively come to an end. Its dismissal by the U.S. Supreme Court, following a procedural ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, marks a significant setback in the plaintiffs' quest for climate justice [1][2][3].

Future Actions:Despite this loss, Our Children's Trust, the organization representing the plaintiffs, plans to regroup and file a new case against the federal government in light of recent legal developments [1][3][4]. The youth-led climate movement, inspired by this case, continues to push for action on climate change globally.

  1. The dismissed lawsuit, Juliana v. United States, initially filed by 21 teenagers and children in Oregon, aimed to appeal the federal government's energy policies regarding climate change.
  2. Despite the Supreme Court's dismissal of the case, Our Children's Trust, the Oregon-based nonprofit behind the lawsuit, announced plans to resolved the issue by filing a new case against the federal government, taking advantage of recent legal developments.
  3. The resolved legal battle, initially appealed by teenagers and young activists, has left many questioning the render of the justice system in addressing climate change, leading to increased global activism among the youth.

Read also:

Latest