Skip to content

High Court in Calcutta grants temporary release for social media personality Sharmistha Panoli

Arrest of Two-Year-Old College Graduate, Panoli, 22, in Gurugram on Friday after public outrage over her May 14 video, as reported by Kolkata Police.

Arrest of 22-year-old Panoli in Gurugram by Kolkata Police on May 28, after her video resulted in...
Arrest of 22-year-old Panoli in Gurugram by Kolkata Police on May 28, after her video resulted in public outrage on May 14.

updated-article:

High Court in Calcutta grants temporary release for social media personality Sharmistha Panoli

Hey there! Let's dive into the latest buzz surrounding social media influencer and law student, Sharmistha Panoli. This gal was caught in the eye of the storm after her controversial video went viral last week. And boy, was it explosive!

So, what happened exactly? Upon posting the video on May 14, Panoli found herself in hot water due to allegations of communal comments and religious sentiment-stirring remarks. The video, which no longer exists, criticized celebrities for supposedly staying quiet during Operation Sindoor—a military response to a tragic April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam that claimed 26 innocent lives.

Who's this Sharmistha Panoli again? Fourth-year law student at Symbiosis International University, Pune, Sharmistha is known for her large online following (over 90k on Instagram and 85k on X, formerly Twitter). Born and raised in Kolkata, she's well-known for her strong political commentary, having divided opinions among internet denizens.

Her controversial video was slammed for the use of communally-charged language and alleged religious insensitivity, leading to numerous complaints and legal action. The Kolkata Police charged her under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, specifically sections related to stirring up enmity between groups, deliberate religious insult, and intent to provoke violence.

Interesting twist! It gets even more intriguing: BJP MLA Agnimitra Paul and West Bengal BJP Legal Cell member Sanjukta Samanta filed an FIR against Wazahat Khan, who initially filed an FIR against Sharmistha Panoli. They made their complaints at two different police stations in Kolkata and Howrah.

Now, as for the details of the video, our enrichment data sheds some light:

  1. Video Content - Panoli responded to a user from Pakistan questioning India's military actions. She disparaged a woman from Pakistan and asserted that we are no longer devotees of Mahatma Gandhi.
  2. Celebrity Criticisms - She also called out actor and YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia for being too soft on Pakistan after the attack, using explicit language in the process.
  3. Arrest and Legal Proceedings - The video ignited a FIR filed at Garden Reach Police Station in Kolkata. Despite initial failed attempts to serve her a legal notice, a court issued a warrant for her arrest. Panoli was eventually apprehended in Gurgaon and presented before a magistrate, who granted transit remand. Eventually, she was sent to judicial custody.
  4. Police Clarification - The Kolkata Police assured that the arrest was lawful and based on Panoli's promotion of communal hatred, not for expressing patriotism or personal beliefs.

Stay tuned as we bring you even more scintillating details on this developing story! Don't forget to bookmark us for all your news and entertainment needs. 🔥🔥

In the world of general-news, the financial and political landscape is being reshaped by the ongoing case of Sharmistha Panoli, a social media influencer and law student. This controversy stems from her viral video that, at its heart, is about crime-and-justice, as it led to various complaints and legal action, including an FIR filed by BJP MLA Agnimitra Paul and West Bengal BJP Legal Cell member Sanjukta Samanta.

The video has sparked intense debate, not only for its use of communally-charged language and alleged religious insensitivity but also for Panoli's comments on Operation Sindoor and her criticisms of celebrities like Ranveer Allahbadia. The markets and political spheres are closely watching the outcomes of this case, as it emphasizes the power and influence of social media in shaping public opinion and the potential consequences of crossing the line in expressing strong political commentary.

Read also:

Latest