SC Orders Karnataka to Release Thug Life, Slams Mob Pressure on Freedom of Speech
High Court Challenges Karnataka over Kamal Haasan's Thug Life Prohibition: 'Public Can't Be Governed by Mob's Decisions'
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court yesterday commanded the Karnataka government to permit the showcase of 'Thug Life', a film produced by Tamil actor Kamal Haasan, without any delays. The ruling comes after protests and threats prompted by Haasan's statement about Kannada's origins led to the film's delay in Karnataka.
In a firm rebuke, the court asserted that vigilante groups cannot control our streets and that the rule of law must prevail. The judges illuminate that expressed disagreement should be met with counterstatement, not unlawful actions or disruptions.
The Karnataka government is ordered to publish a statement within 24 hours, confirming whether Thug Life will screen across the state.
SC Slams Karnataka High Court Over Apology Demand
The court also criticized the Karnataka High Court's demand for an apology from Kamal Haasan for his language remarks, declaring that it is not the high court's responsibility to request an apology. Judicial entities should prioritize safeguarding free speech over succumbing to public ire.
Previously, the high court pondered if Haasan spoke as a historian or linguist and believed the issue could have been resolved with an apology.
Language Row Delays Thug Life Release
Directed by Mani Ratnam, Thug Life marks the duo's first collaboration since 'Nayakan' in 1987. Despite garnering nationwide screenings on June 5, the film was unable to debut in Karnataka, owing to resistance from the Kannada Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) asking for Haasan's public apology beforehand.
The commotion began with Haasan's comment identifying the Kannada language's roots in Tamil, resulting in severe backlash and a boycott call.
Transfer of Case to Supreme Court
The apex court has seized jurisdiction over the case and moved it from the Karnataka High Court. The court will ensure that further proceedings do not succumb to administrative reluctance or interference from extremist groups, preventing the film from being exhibited. The case will be further heard on Thursday, with the Karnataka government asked to provide a detailed report on the film's release.
Enrichment:
The Supreme Court's decision on Thug Life underscores the significance of freedom of expression and the potential hazards of censorship driven by hurt sentiments. The ruling emphasizes that artistic expressions, such as movies and stand-up comedy, should not be halted due to individual or group objections. Additionally, the court's intervention sends a clear message against mob rule in artistic or cultural matters, insisting that law enforcement prioritize upholding constitutionally-protected freedoms in a democratic society rather than capitulating to pressure or violent threats.
The Supreme Court's order to release 'Thug Life' amidst protests highlights the significance of freedom of speech in social media, entertainment, politics, and general news, as artistic expressions should not be silenced due to objections. The court's intervention against mob pressure on freedom of speech also sheds light on the importance of safeguarding free speech in crime and justice matters, ensuring the rule of law prevails over vigilante groups.
