Skip to content

Hidden Agenda Revealed: Global Strategy to Limit Expression of Thoughts and Potential Population Decrease

Suspicious Estimates on U.S. Death Toll:

Coordinated Suppression of Open Discourse | Globally Declared Population Reduction Agenda Revealed
Coordinated Suppression of Open Discourse | Globally Declared Population Reduction Agenda Revealed

Hidden Agenda Revealed: Global Strategy to Limit Expression of Thoughts and Potential Population Decrease

In recent times, there has been a surge of concern regarding the state of free speech and the depopulation of certain nations, particularly the United States. This article aims to separate fact from fiction, and shed light on the truth behind these allegations.

Prominent figures like Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum have been cited as urging an acceleration of a global depopulation program, with the target year brought forward to 2025. However, it is crucial to note that there is no credible evidence linking this statement to a coordinated globalist depopulation plan.

One of the key areas where free speech is under attack is on social media and the internet. The author of this article compares the current situation to George Orwell's 1984, implying a totalitarian control of information. The suppression of free speech is a growing concern, particularly in Western countries such as the UK, USA, Europe, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.

The author also suggests a connection between the suppression of free speech and the global depopulation program. This connection, however, lacks substantiation from any authoritative or verified sources.

One high-profile case of censorship is the arrest and imprisonment of Pavel Durov, the founder and CEO of Telegram, by France's government. Durov's crime? His refusal to provide a backdoor into his software for the FBI or CIA to spy on Telegram's 1.4 billion users.

Another controversial claim is the suggestion that COVID-19 vaccines contain a payload that can be activated externally, potentially through remote RF signals. While such theories are prevalent, there is no scientific evidence to support them.

The Deagel.com's 2018 estimate predicted a US population of 100 million by 2025, implying a reduction of 227 million from 2017 to 2025. However, it is important to note that this estimate is an internet-origin conspiracy theory that projects a drastic population decline for the U.S. without credible or transparent sourcing.

It is also important to clarify that United States Vice President Kamala Harris has not publicly made a statement predicting 220 million American deaths from COVID-19. Such a claim appears to be either misattributed or fabricated.

In the face of such oppression, the author of the article encourages trust in Jesus Christ as a means of overcoming fear. Jesus Christ, according to the author, is an advocate of free speech and truth-telling.

Lastly, there are theories suggesting that globalist elites may have had a long-term plan in place for population reduction, which is now being rapidly implemented. However, these theories have been debunked repeatedly and should be treated with skepticism.

In conclusion, while there are legitimate concerns about the state of free speech and the potential risks associated with certain technologies, it is essential to approach such theories with a critical and fact-based perspective. The idea of a coordinated globalist depopulation plan linked to the figures discussed in this article is unsubstantiated conspiracy theory.

  1. The lack of credible evidence connecting the statement about Klaus Schwab and a coordinated globalist depopulation plan is a testament to the importance of fact-checking in the realm of general-news and politics.
  2. The suppression of free speech on social media and the internet has raised concerns akin to Orwell's 1984 totalitarian control of information, particularly in nations such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.
  3. The theories suggesting a long-term population reduction plan by globalist elites have been repeatedly debunked, emphasizing the need for a fact-based perspective in analyzing articles and articles related to science, freedom, and free speech.

Read also:

    Latest