Skip to content

Hamburg's left fights back against Olympic memorandum

Hamburg's left fights back against Olympic memorandum

Hamburg's left fights back against Olympic memorandum
Hamburg's left fights back against Olympic memorandum

Opposing the Olympic Memorandum, Hamburg's Left Party Stands Strong

Hamburg's opposition party, Die Linke, is taking a stand against the potential German bid for hosting the Olympic and Paralympic Games in the upcoming decade, with Hamburg also eyeing a spot. On Wednesday, Die Linke MP Heike Sudmann criticized the German Olympic Sports Confederation (DOSB) campaign, arguing it fails to shed light on ongoing corruption within the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and city-gagging contracts for bidding cities.

Following a decision by the Hamburg Senate on Tuesday, the second-largest German city agreed to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the DOSB and the federal government. This agreement outlines the review process for the bidding process and the formation of a hosting concept.

Before signing the MoU, the general public and citizens were unaware of its existence, leading Sudmann to call for revocation of the signature.

Although the German Olympic Sports Confederation (DOSB) is actively engaging Hamburg in their quest to host the Olympic and Paralympic Games as indicated in the signed MoU, Die Linke's opposition remains unwavering. The DOSB's campaign is denounced by Sudmann, exposing the corruption ongoing within the IOC and city-gagging contracts.

Though no specific event or controversy surrounding Hamburg's potential participation in the Olympic and Paralympic Games bid is provided, it may be linked to broader political or local issues in Hamburg. For in-depth and accurate information, consult official statements from Hamburg's bid committee and Die Linke to gain a clear understanding of their opposition.

Die Linke's opposition to the Olympic bid may stem from various factors such as environmental concerns, financial implications, social justice issues, and local political agendas. Without explicit details, it is complicated to ascertain the precise reasons behind their opposition.

Latest