Skip to content

Government official under suspension due to vocalizing discontent in judicial setting over incorrect deportation case.

Immigration lawyer from the Justice Department placed on temporary administrative leave following awkward court appearance where key questions remained unanswered due to a blunder in a deportation case, confirmed by two insider sources.

Justice Department of the United States spotted on 25th July, 2023 in Washington D.C.
Justice Department of the United States spotted on 25th July, 2023 in Washington D.C.

A government immigration lawyer is placed on leave following a contentious court case

Government official under suspension due to vocalizing discontent in judicial setting over incorrect deportation case.

In an unusual turn of events, a government immigration lawyer has been put on administrative leave after expressing frustration in court over a case involving a mistaken deportation. This case, revolving around Maryland father Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, has sparked a heated legal battle.

This week, Erez Reuveni, the attorney representing the government in Abrego Garcia's case, admitted in court that the government's only defense was jurisdictional, stating, "he should not have been sent to El Salvador." When questioned why the US couldn't simply request his return, Reuveni admitted that he had asked his clients the same question but didn't receive a straight answer.

Attorney General Pam Bondi expressed her disapproval of Reuveni's handling of the case, stating that any lawyer failing to advocate on behalf of the US would face consequences. The Trump administration, on the other hand, had earlier conceded in a court filing that Abrego Garcia's deportation was due to an "administrative error."

Abrego Garcia, who has been in Salvadoran custody, was originally arrested in Baltimore on March 12 based on suspected ties with the MS-13 gang. Despite a court-ordered status prohibiting his removal to El Salvador, immigration authorities deployed an "administrative error," resulting in his deportation on March 15.

This case is significant, as it highlights broader issues with immigration enforcement practices and the concerns of advocacy groups about the rights of immigrants. It also underscores the need for legislative changes to protect immigrant communities, as it reflects the pushback against policies that allow for mass deportations without due process.

In response to the legal battle, organizations like CASA have strongly criticized the deportation, emphasizing the distress it has caused to Abrego Garcia's family, who are U.S. citizens. The separation of Abrego Garcia from his family, including his wife and children, has been deeply felt, especially since he was the primary provider and caregiver for family members with special needs. There are also concerns for Abrego Garcia's safety, given his fears of persecution and his imprisonment in a notorious facility.

As the legal proceedings continue, Reuveni has yet to comment on the situation. In a LinkedIn post five months prior, he announced his promotion to acting deputy director at the Office of Immigration Litigation. The Justice Department's lack of information in court about certain cases has presented an issue, with some lawyers reportedly unable to answer questions from judges.

Contributions by CNN's Kaanita Iyer and Priscilla Alvarez

[1] CNN Report 1[2] CNN Report 2[3] CASA Statement[4] Human Rights Watch Report

  1. The government immigration lawyer responsible for the Abrego Garcia case, Erez Reuveni, has been put on leave, following his admission in court that the US government's only defense was jurisdictional but failed to explain why the US couldn't simply request his return.
  2. Attorney General Pam Bondi has expressed disapproval of Reuveni's handling of the case, stating that any lawyer failing to advocate on behalf of the US would face consequences, as the Trump administration had earlier conceded that Abrego Garcia's deportation was due to an "administrative error."
  3. Due to the implications of the Abrego Garcia case, concerns about inadequate immigration enforcement practices and advocacy groups' concerns over the rights of immigrants have been raised, emphasizing the need for legislative changes and protection of immigrant communities.

Read also:

Latest