Skip to content

Gouveia and Melo have communicated with the court, have been informed, and will appear in court to provide testimony during the denial hearing.

The Lisbon Criminal Court overlooked the necessity of summoning the Admiral as a witness in a trial pertaining to allegations of offenses and attempted aggression against a presidential candidate, alongside ten other defendants. In a letter addressed to the court, the ex-head of the Covid-19...

Gouveia and Melo have communicated with the court, have been informed, and will appear during the...
Gouveia and Melo have communicated with the court, have been informed, and will appear during the denial hearing to testify.

Gouveia and Melo have communicated with the court, have been informed, and will appear in court to provide testimony during the denial hearing.

Rewrapped: Testimony Blunder

Portugal's Lisbon Criminal Court faced a snag in the high-profile trial involving a presidential candidate and Ferro Rodrigues, as they couldn't contact an admiral to testify as a witness. The former head of the COVID-19 vaccination task force emailed the court, requesting notification.

The court system in Portugal isn't strangers to delay and complexity. Witness this in the prolonged Casa Pia child sexual abuse scandal trial. Delays and troubles with notifications, often linked to the justice system's sluggish pace and susceptibility to external pressures from powerful individuals, have littered court proceedings[1].

In essence, the court's predicament with the admiral stems from the Portuguese justice system's historic challenges in managing high-profile cases featuring influential figures. Its familiar troubles with timeliness and relationships have likely played a role in the issue, potentially complicating the process of gathering testimonies. Simply put, the system is no stranger to slow processes and playing catch-up with high-profile cases, which might have cropped up in this specific instance.

  1. The Portuguese justice system, with its history of managing high-profile cases involving influential figures and tendency towards delays and external pressures, may have played a role in the court's difficulties in contacting the admiral for testimony in the current trial.
  2. The ongoing complications in the court proceedings, such as delays and troubles with notifications, are symptomatic of the general-news-worthy issues that have plagued the court system, making it no stranger to slow processes and challenges in handling high-profile cases.

Read also:

    Latest