"Friend's demise prompts laughter from defendant Sherzat's legal team"
In the courtroom today, the minor witness testifying in the Sherzat Bolat case was subjected to scrutiny, with their representative requesting the judge to reprimand the defense team. The youngster claimed he last saw Sherzat Bolat alive at school in the morning, and hadn't observed him during the altercation.
As the legal representatives for the accused questioned the witness, doubt was cast on the credibility of their statements. Eventually, the representative of the minor couldn't contain their frustration and requested the judge to intervene.
"They chuckle after every response from the minor. What's so funny? A person lost their friend!" the representative exclaimed, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.
In criminal proceedings, a deposition is taken if there are reasons to believe that a later interrogation in court may be impossible or difficult due to objective reasons. The fatal brawl involving 16-year-old Sherzat Bolat and his uncle, Nurkanat Gaiypbaev, transpired in Talgar on the night of October 4, 2024. Currently, nine individuals are on trial. Today, witnesses were questioned and the prosecutor read the testimonies given during the investigation by the deceased uncle of Sherzat Bolat.
A video of Sherzat's uncle's hospital interrogation and testimonies claiming he brought the rifle and fired it upward were presented in court. This ongoing case has shined a spotlight on the role judicial admonishments play in ensuring the accuracy, objectivity, and fairness of testimonies.
Subscribe to our Telegram channel for exclusive content and breaking news updates!
In these high-profile trials, such admonishments aim to balance stringent legal standards with equitable treatment for witnesses. By following best practices, courts can maintain the integrity of testimonies while ensuring procedural justice. It is essential to balance admonishments with sensitivity, ensuring witnesses feel supported and comfortable testifying.
- The defense team's laughter during the questioning of the minor witness in the Sherzat Bolat case has raised concerns about the credibility of their responses.
- In an emotional outburst, the representative of the minor witness expressed frustration over the defense team's behavior, stating, "They chuckle after every response from the minor. What's so funny? A person lost their friend!"
- The ongoing trial for the fatal brawl involving 16-year-old Sherzat Bolat and his uncle, Nurkanat Gaiypbaev, has brought attention to the role of judicial admonishments in maintaining the accuracy, objectivity, and fairness of testimonies.
- It is crucial for courts to implement judicial admonishments in high-profile trials like the Sherzat Bolat case, balancing strict legal standards with equitable treatment for witnesses, ensuring procedural justice, and promoting the integrity of testimonies.
