Four ex-parliamentarians reclaimed freedom following prolonged incarceration years.
Here's the rewritten article:
In a significant development, four ex-legislators from Hong Kong, who were locked up for over four years, have finally walked free after being convicted under Beijing's security law. Their prison terms were served due to their involvement in an unofficial primary election that aimed to challenge the once-powerful pro-democracy movement.
Among the released are Claudia Mo, Jeremy Tam, Kwok Ka-ki, and Gary Fan. These activists have endured years of separation from their loved ones, but they're now rejoining their families, albeit under a cautious mood. The release took place amid tight security, with Claudia Mo's husband, Philip Bowring, expressing relief about her well-being. However, he mentioned that she would not be granting interviews immediately, needing some time to adjust to life outside.
As reported by HK01, Gary Fan expressed his gratitude towards the community and media, promising to reunite with his family soon. Nevertheless, many other activists remain behind bars, their fates uncertain as several appeals are still pending.
The unofficial primary elections back in 2020 drew around 610,000 voters, with the winners expected to compete in the official legislative elections. However, these elections were postponed due to health concerns linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. During their trial, the prosecutors alleged that the activists aimed to destabilize the Hong Kong government and force the city's leader to resign by amassing a legislative majority and blocking the government's budgets.
In the end, only two of the initial 47 defendants were acquitted, while others received prison terms ranging from four years and two months to ten years for conspiracy to commit subversion. The convicted activists, including the four recent releases, pleaded guilty in exchange for reduced sentences.
For the pro-democracy movement, these years of suppression have been challenging, with activists facing harsh legal penalties and political exclusion. These developments have further illustrated the erosion of Western-style civil liberties in Hong Kong, once promised to remain robust for 50 years following the handover to China in 1997.
Critics have criticized the legal action against the activists, viewing their convictions as evidence of the suppression of dissent following the massive anti-government protests in 2019. China has defended the judicial decisions despite international criticism, arguing that the national security law is vital for the city's stability.
The pro-democracy movement now predominantly operates in exile, with local activists facing extreme legal risks and legislative opposition effectively eliminated. The movement's struggle continues, as it wrestles with redefining itself in this severely constricted landscape.
Enrichment Data Integrated:In this updated context, the suppression of Hong Kong's pro-democracy movement has intensified, with key developments such as the dissolution of the Democratic Party and an ongoing crackdown on dissenting voices. The once-largest pro-democracy group, the Democratic Party, disbanded under Beijing's pressure, thereby eliminating opposition voices in legislative elections. Additionally, dozens of pro-democracy figures, including many lawmakers and activists, have been imprisoned under the National Security Law. Foreign-based democracy advocates have also faced arrest warrants and bounties in recent years.
- The following released activists, including Claudia Mo, Jeremy Tam, Kwok Ka-ki, and Gary Fan, will now rejoin their families, but under a cautious mood given the current political climate.
- The erosion of Western-style civil liberties in Hong Kong continues, as the constitutional risks for dissenting voices in politics and general news increase.
- The ongoing crackdown on dissenting voices in Hong Kong has led to the demise of the Democratic Party, eliminating opposition voices in legislative elections.
- The released activists, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit subversion, face ongoing risks in the realms of war-and-conflicts, crime-and-justice, and policy-and-legislation.
- Critics argue that the subversion convictions of pro-democracy activists serve as evidence of a deliberate suppression of dissent, a growing concern in the face of the numerous warrants and bounties issued for foreign-based democracy advocates.
