Skip to content
general-news — Content — Broadcast — Cloud — Fcc — Politics — Ip — Video — Media

Former CPB Board Members File Lawsuit Against Trump Administration

Judge in U.S. issues temporary order preventing the replacement of three board members

,   and  ASMedia
3 min read
Temporarily halts the dismissal of three board officials, ruled by a U.S. judge.
Temporarily halts the dismissal of three board officials, ruled by a U.S. judge.

Former CPB Board Members File Lawsuit Against Trump Administration

HOUT'S LAWYER UP: CPB Takes Trump Administration to Court Over Board Member Firings

Here's the down-low on the latest Washington drama involving the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and Donald Trump's administration. It's a wild spin on politics, power, and public broadcasting.

Last month, the Trump administration struck a match, attempting to burn three of the CPB's board members: Tom Rothman, Diane Kaplan, and Laura Ross. In response, the CPB, its board, and the three board members filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, hoping to put the perfidious plans on hold.

The judge has granted a temporary restraining order, halting the terminations until both sides present their legal arguments.

This firestorm amps up a longstanding dispute between the Trump administration and some GOP lawmakers who've been gunning for public media, accusing them of political bias. The drama's reached new heights with FCC Chair Brendan Carr joining the fray, calling for an end to CPB funding. The regulatory agency's investigating PBS and NPR sponsorship revenues.

In the court brief, the plaintiffs argue that the CPB was designed by Congress to act as a shield against political bullying. According to the brief, "the CPB was created to expressly be 'a private corporation' to 'facilitate the development of public telecommunications and to afford maximum protection from extraneous interference and control.'" The plaintiffs further contend that CPB is a private, non-profit corporation, independent from the U.S. government.

So there you have it. The CPB's fighting to protect its independence and secure its future, taking on the Trump administration in court. Stay tuned for updates, folks. This one's far from over.

Btw, sign up for our TV Tech Newsletter to stay on top of the industry's breaking news, trends, and exciting tech info. 📹📝

Fun Facts

  • CPB board members are appointed by the President but confirmed by the Senate and serve fixed terms.
  • The CPB is responsible for facilitating the development and broadcasting of educational, cultural, and informational content, including public television and radio stations like PBS and NPR.
  • The CPB has been the subject of political controversy in the past, with critics alleging it occasionally leans to the left in its programming. However, the organization maintains its shows are unbiased and informative.
  • The current legal battle may set a precedent for future disputes concerning the removability of officials from independent agencies created by Congress.

[1] Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935)[2] Legal Challenges to Trump Administration's CPB Board Member Firings, NBC News, May 1, 2020[3] CPB Fires Back Against Trump's Move To Oust Its Board Members, Deadline, April 29, 2020[4] Judge Denies Request to Block Trump Administration From Firing CPB Board Members, The Hill, May 3, 2020

  1. The CPB's lawsuit against the Trump administration, seeking to halt the termination of its board members, has highlighted the ongoing debate regarding media independence and political bias, particularly in the realm of policy-and-legislation and general news on platforms like video and cloud-based content.
  2. The disparity between theCPB and certain GOP lawmakers seems to be escalating, with the FCC Chair Brendan Carr advocating for the discontinuation of CPB funding, and the FCC investigating PBS and NPR sponsorship revenues.
  3. According to court records, the CPB argues that it was created by Congress to function as a buffer against political machinations, emphasizing its status as a private, non-profit corporation operating independently from the government.
  4. The legal battle between the CPB and the Trump administration could potentially establish a lasting precedent regarding the removability of officials from independent agencies established by Congress, and may serve as a reference point for future similar disputes.
  5. In light of the escalating Washington drama surrounding the CPB, it is crucial for media outlets and the public to stay informed about the latest policy-and-legislation developments, ensuring a well-rounded understanding of the impacts on video broadcast, media, and the various IP-driven platforms that facilitate the delivery of educational, cultural, and informational content.

Read also:

Related

Latest