Forecasted staff reductions spur concern among ex-weather service leaders, with potential fatalities cited as significant risk.
Heads Up: Unprecedented Warnings from Former NWS Directors Over Looming Threats
A chilling missive penned by five ex-National Weather Service (NWS) bigwigs is making waves, as they sound the alarm on potential dangers arising from Trump admin cuts.
"The breeze in our sails is fading," they state in the stark, Friday-dated letter, "and we're stepping onto thin ice if NWS staff continue to dwindle." Their worst-case scenario? "A disastrous chain reaction of needless loss of life due to understaffed weather forecast offices."
Since Trump's second term commenced, over 10% of NWS employees—a hefty chunk—have been let go or taken buyout offers. As we stride into the heart of severe weather season, they're burning the midnight oil to alert us to the dire implications of forecasting's decline.
You name it—from pilots circling the skies to sailors navigating the high seas, farmers tilling the land, and first responders readying their emergency kits—all rely on NWS predictions to carry on their daily operations safely. But here's the kicker: NWS warns us during critical weather events—think tornadoes, hurricanes, flooding, wildfires, and the like.
Joe Friday, who helmed the service from 1988 to 1997, puts it bluntly: "We're staring rocky times ahead if meteorologists are stretched thin, forced to issue severe warnings with even shorter lead times." Friday, alongside ex-bosses like Louis Uccellini, Jack Hayes, D.L. Johnson, and John J. Kelly Jr., put their signatures on the letter.
Yet, the National Weather Service kept quiet when approached for comment.
However, a storm's brewing on the horizon. This past Friday, the White House spilled ink on a budget proposal that slashes NWS's parent agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), by a steep $1.5 billion. Despite the budget's silence on specific service cuts, it does mention severe reductions to NOAA's research division, posing grave concerns.
"If we don't mend the gaps in our weather forecasting armor now," Friday cautions, "the always-looming specter of privatization may take center stage."
The proposed budget's retrogressive twist echoes a 2023 policy proposal by the conservative Heritage Foundation, which sought to break up NOAA and privatize the weather service. Friday fears the erosion of NWS's accuracy might eventually fuel the fire for its privatization.
"A cunning strategy," Friday remarks, "to dismantle the organization from the inside."
© 2025 The New York Times Company
An Inside Scoop:
Proposed cuts and staffing declines at the National Weather Service (NWS) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) may gravely impact weather forecasting and public safety. Here's the deal:
Consequences for Weather Forecasting and Safety
- Forecast Quality and Public Safety:
- Skewed Predictions: Budget cuts and staff shortages risk reducing forecast accuracy and potency, which can be a matter of life or death during emergencies like hurricanes, floods, heatwaves, and wildfires.
- Heightened Risks: Inadequate forecasting can elevate risks for the public, making it harder to prepare for and handle emergencies effectively.
- Workforce and Vacancy Issues:
- Workload Overload: Soaring vacancy rates—estimated to potentially reach 35%—could overwhelm remaining employees, impacting service quality even further.
- Expert Departure: Loss of seasoned personnel can lead to a knowledge drain, affecting the continuity and longevity of high-quality forecasting.
- Climate Research Casualties:
- Research Collapse: The budget proposal targets almost all climate-focused research, essential for predicting long-term weather patterns and assessing climate change impacts.
- Adaptation Challenges: Without robust climate research, the U.S. may struggle to adapt to changing climate realities, leaving infrastructure and lives vulnerable.
- Financial and Infrastructure Woes:
- Economic Pain: Inaccurate forecasts and warnings can lead to substantial economic losses, as businesses and governments rely on accurate weather data.
- Infrastructure Vulnerabilities: Reduced research and forecasting capabilities could hamper efforts to enhance infrastructure resilience against extreme weather events, exacerbating damage costs.
To put it briefly, proposed cuts at NWS and NOAA could cripple weather forecasting quality, safety, and economic stability, exacerbating the challenges posed by future climate events.
- The ex-Directors' warning highlights potential disastrous consequences of understaffed weather forecast offices, especially during critical events such as tornadoes, hurricanes, flooding, and wildfires.
- The stark letter penned by former NWS Bigwigs warns of a chain reaction of needless loss of life due to understaffed weather forecast offices, as a result of Trump administration cuts.
- The NWS's warnings during critical weather events serve numerous sectors, including aviation, maritime, agriculture, and emergency services, ensuring their daily operations are carried out safely.
- If meteorologists are stretched thin and are forced to issue severe warnings with even shorter lead times, as suggested by Joe Friday, dire implications for public safety may ensue.
- The proposed budget, slashing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) by a steep $1.5 billion, poses grave concerns for the continuation of essential weather forecasting and climate research.
- The erosion of the National Weather Service's accuracy might eventually fuel the fire for its privatization, as suggested by Friday, implying a possible shift in the policy-and-legislation landscape of weather forecasting.
