Fomenting Discord | Manipulating Intra-Community Disagreements
In recent times, England has witnessed a series of incidents that have been labelled as riots. However, a critical analysis by TheLibertyBeacon.com suggests that these disturbances may not be spontaneous uprisings but rather calculated phenomena designed to engineer social discord for political control.
According to the analysis, these inter-community riots are deliberately engineered to create mistrust, fear, and hostility between different ethnic or social groups. This "divide and rule" tactic weakens the social fabric and prevents unified opposition to political elites or governing authorities.
The narrative further suggests that mainstream media, along with political figures, often frame these conflicts in ways that emphasise community blame and moral failure, rather than structural causes such as poverty, inequality, or policy failures. This framing serves to justify increased policing and surveillance while obscuring underlying grievances.
By fomenting division, these engineered conflicts serve to distract the public from more pressing issues such as economic disenfranchisement, austerity measures, and erosion of civil liberties. The resultant social polarization can hinder cohesive social movements or calls for systemic reform.
The analysis may draw parallels with previous instances of social unrest in England and elsewhere, suggesting a pattern wherein state or establishment actors have used social engineering to influence public order and maintain existing power structures.
It is important to note that hundreds of people with genuine fears and concerns have also been involved in these incidents. The influx of people is engineered to foment fears and cause inter-community conflict. The retaliation is often made to look like it comes from the entire Muslim community or the "far right" protestors in England's recent staged "riots" are not a large group.
Immigrant communities express concerns about acceptance and living rights, while indigenous communities (white and black) worry about being overwhelmed by an influx of unfamiliar people with strange languages and customs. Hardcore extremists on both sides have been known to throw bricks at mosques or other symbolic targets, provoking a retaliation from hardcore extremists in the other community.
However, it is crucial to remember that the majority of people within any community are people of good will who wish to resolve differences and live in peace. Just laws that apply to all without exception are crucial for cementing communities together in nationhood. The fears of various communities are genuine and need to be addressed, but are instead being whipped up and not addressed.
The rich and powerful are often immune to the laws that bind everyone else and are not held accountable for their wrongdoing. This further fuels the anger and resentment within communities, making them more susceptible to manipulation.
In conclusion, it is essential to approach inter-community conflicts with a critical eye, questioning the narratives presented by the media and political figures. By doing so, we can work towards fostering understanding, empathy, and unity amongst our diverse communities, rather than allowing ourselves to be divided and controlled by those who seek to maintain the status quo.
- The analysis points out that inter-community conflicts, such as the recent riots in England, may be deliberately engineered to create tension and mistrust, with the goal of political control, rather than being spontaneous uprisings.
- By exploring the structural causes of conflicts, such as poverty, inequality, and policy failures, instead of blaming certain communities, we can work towards promoting unity and justice within our diverse communities, and prevent them from being manipulated for political gain.
