Skip to content

Final Hearing Date Set by Madras High Court for RMG Lawsuit

Madras High Court has scheduled the sequel hearing for the litigation against RMG websites, upholding the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Online Gambling and the Regulation of Online Games Act.

High Court of Madras has scheduled the subsequent hearing for the lawsuit against RMG websites,...
High Court of Madras has scheduled the subsequent hearing for the lawsuit against RMG websites, maintaining the Tamil Nadu Act on the Prohibition of Online Gambling and Regulation of Online Games.

Final Hearing Date Set by Madras High Court for RMG Lawsuit

In the heart of South India, the bustling state of Tamil Nadu has found itself at the center of a raging legal battle between the Tamil Nadu Online Gaming Authority (TNOGA) and online gaming companies. Here's a lowdown on the key points at stake:

Curfew Hours and Pop-ups: A contentious cease-fire?

TNOGA has instituted regulations that mandate a halt in online gaming activities between midnight and 5 am, supplemented by continuous pop-up notifications to warn users about the risks associated with excessive gaming. However, leading gaming apps, including popular fantasy cricket platforms, ostensibly defy these regulations, persisting in their operations during the prohibited hours sans the required alerts [2].

A division bench of the Madras High Court has adjourned its decision on appeals lodged by gaming companies, challenging a previous court ruling favoring Tamil Nadu's online gaming law and regulations. Despite the single judge's exemption of online rummy and poker, perceived as skill-based games, the rest of the regulations remain intact [2].

Public Opinion: A sea of support for restrictions

Despite the legal standoff, public backing for online gaming regulations is unequivocal. State-led surveys indicate that the overwhelming majority, over 99%, support a complete prohibition on online gaming [2]. The government is actively scrutinizing the existing legal framework with the potential aim of bolstering its stance against online gaming.

Hotly disputed regulations

  • Age Limits: TNOGA enforces age restrictions, barring minors under the age of 18 from participating in online gaming. Enforcement remains an issue, as authorities grapple with verifying the ages of users [4].
  • Authentication and Verification: The regulations require users to undergo rigorous verification processes, including two-factor authentication and Aadhaar verification, to ensure account ownership [1][4].
  • Monetary Recharge Limits: Strict limits have been imposed on the amount that users can recharge their gaming accounts, a factor that certain gaming companies may perceive as restrictive [2].

As the legal battle between TNOGA and online gaming companies unfolds, the future of online gaming in Tamil Nadu hangs in the balance. The legal landscape is muddy, with a myriad of challenges and disputes tearing at its edges. Keep watching this space for updates on the evolving situation.

  • The Tamil Nadu Online Gaming Authority (TNOGA) has set regulations, including age limits, requiring minors to be 18 or older and prohibiting online gaming during curfew hours, with continuous pop-up notifications about risks. However, some leading sports-betting and fantasy cricket platforms reportedly flout these rules.
  • A division bench of the Madras High Court has delayed its decision on gaming companies' appeals challenging TNOGA's regulations, while upholding restrictions on all games except online rummy and poker. The government, backed by public opinion, is scrutinizing the legal framework to further strengthen its stance against online gaming.
  • The regulations enforce strict verification processes for users, including two-factor authentication and Aadhaar verification, and impose limits on monetary recharges for gaming accounts, a point of contention for some gaming companies.
  • The future of online sports-betting and other gaming activities in Tamil Nadu is uncertain as both TNOGA and gaming companies alike wait for a definitive court decision in this drawn-out legal battle.

Read also:

Latest