Federal forces dispatched by the Trump administration significantly augment their presence in Los Angeles, amplifying their numbers by more than twofold.
In the heart of Washington, tensions escalated as the Pentagon intensified its federal response to immigration enforcement protests in Los Angeles on Monday. A battalion of 700 Marines was mobilized, and the number of California National Guard troops doubled, with officials stating it was a limited mission to protect federal properties and agents.
Despite President Donald Trump's claims of having the situation "very well under control," these actions raised eyebrows, especially the deployment of active-duty Marines. Historically, military troops are used within the U.S. only in exceptional circumstances, making this move notable and troublesome for state and city officials, legal experts, and Congressional Democrats.
The confusion deepened when city officials reported peaceful protests, yet more National Guard troops were called up. As the Marines joined the fray, now approximately 4,700 troops were assigned to Los Angeles.
Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell voiced concerns about the possible arrival of federal military forces, stating it posed significant logistical and operational challenges for those responsible for safeguarding the city. The deployment's justification remains unclear, as the Posse Comitatus Act generally restricts active-duty forces from domestic law enforcement unless the president invokes the little-used Insurrection Act, which Trump hasn't done so far.
Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the move, stating it was intended to sow fear and division. The state filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's decision, calling it unlawful.
While Trump trumpeted success and insinuated that the military response was provocation, not merely an escalation, Newsom argued that some of the first 2,000 National Guard troops deployed had not been utilized. He suggested the addition of Marines was more political than necessary for security concerns.
The use of active-duty Marines and the expanding role of military forces on American soil has caught the attention of senators such as Jack Reed, ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Reed denounced the move as an overreach of the president's power, potentially turning a tense situation into a national crisis.
The controversial deployment continues to stoke political tensions and fuel public concerns about state sovereignty, the escalation of tensions, and the legal and operational implications.
© 2025 The New York Times Company
Enrichment Data:1. The decision to deploy active-duty Marines stirred concerns about state sovereignty, as it was initiated without a request from California's Governor Gavin Newsom.2. Critics argue that the deployment could escalate tensions, as military involvement can be seen as a heavy-handed approach potentially exacerbating the protests and conflicting with local law enforcement strategies.3. Legal and operational concerns arise from the use of active-duty troops, including questions about appropriate use of force and potential civilian detentions, as outlined in Pentagon guidelines.4. The move has intensified political tensions between the Trump administration and California officials, with accusations of incompetence and abuse of power being exchanged.
- The deployment of active-duty Marines without a request from California's Governor Gavin Newsom has sparked discussions about state sovereignty.
- Critics contend that the military's involvement risks escalating tensions, as a heavy-handed approach could potentially aggravate the protests and hinder local law enforcement methods.
- There are legal and operational concerns regarding the use of active-duty troops, such as questions about the appropriate use of force and potential civilian detentions, as regulated by Pentagon guidelines.
