"Compact" Magazine's Future Hangs in the Balance as Federal Court Lays Down the Law
- *
Court Considers Fate of 'Compact' Publication in Federal Hearing - Federal Court of Justice weighs in on "Compact" magazine's fate
Get the latest in Berlin politics straight to your inbox - Subscribe to our free capital newsletter!
It's showdown time! The Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig is delving into the thick of things, weighing the fate of the controversial right-wing extremist publication, "Compact". The courtroom was buzzing with anticipation as the oral proceedings attracted spectators and media bigwigs aplenty.
In an unprecedented move, the judges granted a temporary reprieve to the publication during an expedited procedure. Now, with the main proceedings in full swing, "Compact" stands on the edge of a precipice. The trial is set to continue on Wednesday.
The nitty-gritty...
Enter the emotional whirlwind of July 16, 2024. The Federal Minister of the Interior, Nancy Faeser (SPD), wielded her authority to ban the magazine, deeming it as "the vocal chord of the right-wing extremist crowd." This move sealed the deal for the termination of the entire print and online editions of "Compact".
The ban decree cited concerns that the "Compact" publication would incite individuals to act against the constitutional order. The Constitutional Protection Agency had assessed the media company as more than just a thorn in the side of the federal government but also as a menace to the political system at large.
Legal matters...
This is where association law enters the fray. According to the Federal Ministry of the Interior, conditions allow even businesses to be banned under certain circumstances. The Federal Administrative Court, sans complaint during the expedited procedure, conceded this point.
Center stage...
The crux of the debate lies in determining if the actions and statements of the media company transcend freedom of expression and present a clear, quantifiable threat. Judges must further clarify whether association law is applicable in this distinct scenario and whether it usurps freedom of opinion and the press. As Wolfgang Roth, the ministry's process representative, articulated in court, the ban was aimed at "safeguarding the constitutional order".
Apparent contradictions...
However, according to "Compact" attorney Ulrich Vosgerau, this dubious assumption that the association law is applicable to a press publication is a fundamental error. Vosgerau harbored doubts that the court would reconsider its position on this matter.
Is "Compact" more than just a media company?
The ministry casts "Compact" magazine GmbH as the focus of the Constitutional Protection Agency for some time now and has classified it as a monitored, right-wing extremist association as of the end of 2021. Founded in 2010, the publication moved from the Brandenburg town of Falkensee to Stoßen in Saxony-Anhalt. The approximate circulation of "Compact" magazine amounts to 40,000 copies, while their online TV channel boosts a reach of up to 460,000 clicks.
Jabber-jawing...
Chief editor Jürgen Elsässer's infamous exclamation, "We want to overthrow the regime," during the oral proceedings, has set tongues wagging. According to Senate chairman Ingo Kraft, these words suggest a goal that justifies corresponding texts. However, from Vosgerau's perspective, Elsässer's remarks were nothing more than blustering bombast that did not connote the termination of the rule of law was in the works. Elsässer himself, accompanied by his wife and Paul Klemm of the "Compact" magazine's TV station, asserted that while the magazine boasts a few right-wing authors, it is neither right-wing nor far-right. "We are optimistic that the court will make a democratic decision," Elsässer chimed, marking his wedding anniversary with a celebratory air.
The hot take from "Compact" chief...
Elsaesser exuded confidence when asked on his thoughts regarding the proceedings. "In a democracy, you can't ban a magazine like 'Compact'. Because 'Compact' defends the liberal democratic order against the authoritarian overreach of the government," he declared. "We've never been convicted for content." During the trial, Elsaesser positioned himself as the puppetmaster, the sole arbiter of decisions within the GmbH. "Compact" GmbH, he stated, is not a club.
Elsaesser disclosed that about 30 employees were working round the clock in the publishing house, brimming with editorial work. Instead of generating advertising revenue, they organized press festivals and, as Elsaesser put it, "played up our role, as if we were part of a movement." Should the ban ensue against Elsaesser’s expectations, "Compact" would fall into criminality instantaneously. Although the path to the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe remains open, it lacks suspensive effect. "We're prepared for everything," Elsaesser said.
The German Journalists' Association's take on the proceedings...
"The decision has profound implications for freedom of opinion and the press," the DJV opined. In the crosshairs is the question of whether a combative-aggressive stance of the association towards the constitutional order can be proven. "Only then would a full ban be justified," the association told Deutsche Presse-Agentur. A comprehensive overall assessment shields media organizations from being banned based on isolated statements. "It must be prevented that an entire magazine is banned if only one aspect is unconstitutional," the DJV insisted. Alternative measures, such as restricting individual contributions, event bans, or location-specific speech bans, are also viable options.
The next move...
The court will scrutinize the ban decree and comb through the arguments put forth by both parties during the oral proceedings. After approximately eight hours, the trial adjourned, with individual statements in the magazines taking center stage on the second day of the trial. The trial will continue by evaluating quotes from the evidence provided by the Federal Ministry of the Interior in excess of 240 pages, encompassing instances of demeaning behavior, breaches of democratic principles and the rule of law, racism, and anti-Semitism.
In conclusion… It's now a waiting game. Although the provisional victory allows "Compact" to keep publishing for the time being, the final verdict will be pivotal in determining whether the ban threatens the bedrock of freedom of expression and press in Germany.
- The oral proceedings at the Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig are highlighting the future of the controversial right-wing extremist publication, "Compact", which stands on the brink of being banned due to concerns that it incites individuals to act against the constitutional order.
- The debate in the court centers around determining if the actions and statements of "Compact" magazine transcend freedom of expression, present a clear, quantifiable threat, and whether association law is applicable in this distinct scenario and whether it usurps freedom of opinion and the press.
