Skip to content

FCC PoliticsShuffled Following Kimmel Controversy

Power-wielding parties in exile spend considerable time pondering over the opportunities they missed with their authority.

Kimmel controversy reshaping FCC political landscape
Kimmel controversy reshaping FCC political landscape

FCC PoliticsShuffled Following Kimmel Controversy

In the world of media and politics, change is a constant. Here are some key developments that have shaped the landscape recently.

Prominent Democrats, including Senator Amy Klobuchar and Representative Jerry Nadler, have proposed reforms aimed at reducing media market concentration and limiting government officials' control over broadcast content. This comes as a response to concerns about media consolidation and the potential influence it may wield.

The role of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in regulating media companies' acquisitions has undergone a transformation. The Democrats are considering replacing the 1996 Telecommunications Act to de-concentrate media and communications systems, a move that could reshape the industry significantly.

In the realm of entertainment, major networks have seen a shift towards more liberal comedy and drama, with hosts like Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert expressing liberal views. However, it's important to note that the owners of big media companies and their customers are not necessarily liberal or anti-Trump.

The FCC's power to fine networks for airing obscenities has been used less frequently as pop culture has become more vulgar. Yet, the line between acceptable content and censorship remains a contentious issue. In Reason, Jacob Sullum accuses FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr of abusing his powers by punishing private companies for giving a forum to politically disfavored speakers.

The Jimmy Kimmel suspension, related to Nexstar's station acquisition bid and Commissioner Carr's role, is a current topic of discussion. Conservatives have built studios in Nashville and Provo to attract audiences with content more in line with their perspectives, creating a more diverse media landscape.

President Trump's approach to media regulation during his first term was markedly different from his second. While in his first term, he inherited a system where the FCC decides which media companies can buy each other, networks decide what goes on the air, and viewers decide whether to watch, in his second term, he renounced this approach and supported the removal of certain personalities from the airwaves for spreading misinformation.

Democrats have endorsed the deplatforming of Covid skeptics and election conspiracy theorists on social media. However, this has sparked debates about free speech and censorship. In The Federalist, Eddie Scarry argues that Democrats aren't credible when they accuse Commissioner Carr of attacking free expression.

The House is set to vote on a bill to avert a shutdown proposed by Republicans. Meanwhile, Matt Stoller calls for the repeal of the 1996 law and the passage of new legislation to get rid of the ability of corporate executives or political leaders to engage in coercive arbitrary behavior.

In the political sphere, Reed Showalter, a Democratic antitrust attorney, is running for Congress in Chicago, advocating for breaking up media companies to neutralize government influence. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have strengthened ties with a defense deal, while President Trump hails progress on trade and TikTok deal in a phone call with China's Xi.

Lastly, Emma Walmsley is leading an impatient overhaul of GSK, and Medium plans to use AI to pay creators more fairly. Broadridge's CEO advises new hires not to 'change the world on their first day'. Ramaswamy has secured the endorsement of the Teamsters, adding another layer of complexity to the evolving media and political landscape.

Read also:

Latest