Skip to content

FBI Head, Post on Judge's Arrest Vanishes, Leaving Mystery Over Reason

Kash Patel alleges that Judge Hannah Dugan assisted a criminal in evading Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

FBI Head, Post on Judge's Arrest Vanishes, Leaving Mystery Over Reason

Rewritten Article:

Kash Patel, a controversial figure with a penchant for conspiracy theories, deleted then re-tweeted claims about the arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on allegations she obstructed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

At 10:11 a.m. ET on Friday, Patel, who serves as the FBI director, posted a tweet alleging that Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected federal agents away from a subject to be arrested, allowing the intended arrestee to evade capture. The tweet stated that the judge's actions created increased danger to the public. However, Patel later deleted the tweet before resharing it two hours later with the same wording.

In the original tweet, Patel described the scene as if he was in a cheesy 1980s action movie, thanking the FBI agents for "chasing down the perp on foot." He ended the tweet by promising more information to come and tagging the X account for the FBI in Milwaukee.

The URL for the original tweet now displays an error message, while the re-tweet appears to have identical wording, leaving the reason for the deletion a mystery. The U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately respond to questions about Patel's tweet emailed on Friday.

According to the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, ICE agents arrived at the Milwaukee County Courthouse on April 18 to arrest a Mexican citizen in Judge Dugan's courtroom. The newspaper reports that Dugan directed the ICE agents to the chief justice's office, and the intended arrestee left through a side door. Experts consulted by the Journal-Sentinel had varying opinions on Dugan's alleged conduct, but none believed she should be charged with a crime.

The U.S. Marshals Service confirmed that Dugan was arrested around 8:30 a.m. local time (9:30 a.m. ET) on courthouse property. She appeared before a magistrate judge and has been charged with two felonies, obstruction and concealing an individual. Dugan made no comment during the hearing, but her attorney stated that the arrest was "not made in the interest of public safety."

Franklyn Gimbel, a former federal prosecutor in Milwaukee, called the arrest "outrageous," suggesting that the FBI could have simply invited Dugan to surrender herself. Nevertheless, the ongoing tension between the Trump administration's immigration policies and local authorities may have played a role in the high-profile case.

Born and educated in Wisconsin, Judge Dugan was elected to the county court in 2016 and worked for Legal Action of Wisconsin and the Legal Aid before that. This arrest marks a significant turn in her career.

In a similar case, President Donald Trump pursued charges against a federal judge in Massachusetts in 2019. However, the charges were dropped during the Biden administration in 2022. Trump has made it clear that he intends to target judges as a means to impose his particular brand of authoritarianism in the United States. His associates, like Elon Musk, the head of DOGE, have repeatedly advocated for the prosecution of judges.

Kash Patel, confirmed as FBI director in late February, has embraced the QAnon conspiracy theory, published a list of alleged deep state officials to target, and made threats against the media. Despite this, some critics have expressed frustration over what they perceive as slow action on the part of the FBI director in enacting retribution against his perceived enemies. With the arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan, we may see a change in this perspective.

  1. New Voices call on Supreme Court to do more to prevent surveillance of non-violent activists
  2. ICE Agents, in Violation of Federal Law, Arrested Juveniles in Rishee Grove; Parents Say It's Part of a Broader Problem
  3. Despite the controversial actions of Kash Patel, the FBI director, discussions about policy-and-legislation regarding technology and the future of general news, particularly regarding the role of politics and crime-and-justice, have intensified in various policy circles and media outlets.
  4. As the debate surrounding Judge Hannah Dugan's arrest unfolds, tech enthusiasts at Gizmodo are following the unfolding events, with many questioning the broader implications for judicial independence and the relationship between the tech industry and law enforcement.
  5. In the midst of the ongoing controversy, many have turned to social media platforms like Twitter to voice their opinions on the matter, expressing concerns about the potential misuse of technology in law enforcement and the erosion of civil liberties in the future.
  6. In light of the recent arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan and the heated debates surrounding her actions, it is crucial for the public to remain informed about policy-and-legislation regarding technology and the role of law enforcement in shaping the future of politics and justice in the United States.

Read also:

Latest