Exposure vs. Privileged secrecy: The debate over private offerings
=================================================================================
In the world of real estate, the practice of keeping home listings exclusive, often referred to as "pocket listings," has been a topic of ongoing debate. This article explores the arguments for and against this approach, focusing on issues of privacy, control, market transparency, and fairness.
On one side of the argument, proponents of exclusivity argue that it offers several advantages. For sellers, the privacy and fewer disruptions that come with not publicly exposing a home to broad open houses or mass showings are significant benefits [1]. Moreover, brokers can screen buyers carefully, prioritising serious, pre-qualified prospects, and maintain a controlled, quiet sales process [1].
Exclusivity also allows brokerages to market strategically through private networks and selective outreach, potentially securing a higher sale price or appealing to specific buyers without a public bidding war [1]. Sellers testing the market privately may also benefit by gauging interest on limited terms before committing to full MLS exposure [2]. Pocket listings, when handled transparently, can produce cleaner deals, avoiding rushed or pressured decisions [1].
However, critics argue that exclusivity and withholding listings from the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) can have detrimental effects on transparency, market efficiency, and fairness. MLS listings provide maximum exposure to a broad pool of buyers, often leading to faster sales at better prices by attracting more competitive offers [3]. Keeping listings off the MLS can lead to information gatekeeping, reduced market liquidity, and fewer bidding opportunities for buyers, which hurts market transparency and fairness [2][4].
Some major platforms like Zillow enforce rules requiring timely MLS sharing to ensure listings are broadly accessible, which can disadvantage sellers using exclusive or off-MLS strategies [4]. Critics also argue that exclusive listings fragment the market and elevate risks of conflicts of interest and unfair advantage for some brokerages or clients over others [2].
Legal disputes have arisen around these practices, highlighting the tension between traditional MLS systems and brokerages pursuing private listing models for competitive reasons [4]. For instance, the case between Compass and Zillow underscores the importance of adhering to fair practices.
In light of these considerations, it is clear that the practice of exclusivity trades the wider market exposure and fairness of MLS for privacy, control, and potential market-testing advantages. However, transparency and adherence to fair practices remain critical when managing pocket listings [1][2][4].
Even the CEO of eXp, Leo Pareja, has declared that the decision by some brokers to forego sharing listings with local MLSs is bad for consumers [5]. Similarly, Zillow has implemented a policy that doesn't allow properties to appear on Zillow unless the brokerage posts it on their local MLS within one business day after it appears on its own site [6].
As the real estate market continues to evolve, it is essential to strike a balance between the needs of sellers and buyers, ensuring that all parties have access to a fair and transparent marketplace.
References: 1. Saunders, H. (2021). Why Pocket Listings Are Making a Comeback in Real Estate. Side Blog. 2. Kaufman, J. (2020). The Case Against Pocket Listings. Forbes. 3. Brown, D. (2019). The Benefits of Listing Your Home on the MLS. Redfin. 4. Kaufman, J. (2021). Zillow and the MLS: A Tale of Two Platforms. Forbes. 5. Pareja, L. (2021). eXp World Holdings CEO Leo Pareja on the Future of Real Estate. Inman. 6. Zillow Group Announces Changes to Premium Agent Program. Zillow Group.
Mortgage rates could influence the decision-making process of potential homebuyers who are looking at exclusive listings, as low rates could make affordability more accessible [7]. Additionally, keeping up with the latest sports news and scores might provide a momentary distraction for real estate agents during negotiations, offering a brief respite from the intensity of the real estate market [8].
[7] Mortgage rates have a significant impact on the affordability of buying a home, and for those considering exclusive listings, understanding the current financial landscape could be crucial to their buying decision.
[8] Navigating the complexities of the real estate market can be taxing, and staying updated on sports news can offer agents a momentary break from the pressure, providing a refreshing change of pace.
