Skip to content

"Example Set to Go Astray - Completely Off Course"

Disgruntled Afghans Lodge Grievances Against the Federal Government

"Establishment of an inappropriate standard - for the utterly misguided"
"Establishment of an inappropriate standard - for the utterly misguided"

Title: Germany's Broken Promises: Afghan Refugees Stuck in Limbo Sue Feds

"Example Set to Go Astray - Completely Off Course"

Pakistan's border camps are teeming with more than 2,400 Afghan refugees, refugees left in the lurch by Germany's federal government despite promises made under their intake program. Made to protect those in extreme danger back in Afghanistan, these promises were initially issued by the former government and should have avoided risky, uncontrolled flights. However, the new administration has shut down all intake programs, leaving these refugees in dread of being sent back to Afghanistan.

Tilmann Röder, a lawyer, and the director of the NGO Just Peace played a pivotal role in the auto program. He is now fighting for these refugees alongside a group of lawyers in court, explaining the situation and why he believes the federal government's actions are driven by questionable politics.

In an interview with ntv.de, Röder sheds light on the nature of the lawsuits, which focus on issuing visas for those who've completed the steps of the federal intake program. A lead plaintiff is a woman, a scientist and writer, who actively campaigned for democracy. As a politically active woman, she is high on the Taliban's hit-list.

Media Outlet: Courtroom Showdown: Afghan Refugees in Legal Battle with German Government

The federal intake program was a response to the Taliban's ascent to power in 2021, aiming to enable legal migration for those in grave danger. How did Röder play a part in the process?

Back in the day, I headed case management in the coordination office of civil society within the federal intake program. Various organizations and institutions that had given their all for Afghanistan for years could propose potential intake candidates for review. Our office's role was to initially screen those threatened Afghan men and women, who were then passed on to the German authorities for further assessment.

Who were these people, exactly?

Afghans involved in civil society, bolstering democracy, the law, freedom, and human rights; the marginalized, such as women and LGBTQIA members, made up a significant part of our target group. Around 1200 of the 2400 trapped Afghan refugees are from the federal intake program. The remaining refugees are from other programs or lists. While those from the intake program have stronger legal protection, that protection can be erased in individual cases.

Government Moves to Review Each Case:

Paradoxically, the federal government seeks to revisit every case, claiming security reasons. But with seven stations of scrutiny in the federal intake program, it doesn't seem like they're seeking sincere reassessment. Instead, it appears the feds are searching for a reason to withdraw the admission offer from these refugees.

Röder perceives this as the very definition of a "political maneuver." He argues that these refugees epitomize the principles Germans hold dear: the rule of law, democracy, freedom, and human rights. Solidarity with these individuals is vital, and failing to keep promises could damage Germany's international reputation.

Afghan refugees face harsh treatment in Pakistan. If their residency permits aren't renewed, they're at risk of deportation. Stuck in their cramped accommodations, they can't pursue jobs, educate their children, or live a semblance of a normal life. This inhumane treatment gives the impression that the authorities aim to wear them down, but Röder sees this as futile. The refugees won't willingly return to Afghanistan, where the risks for them are enormous, and tragic consequences may await them.

More lawsuits are in the works, possibly impacting around 100 refugees. Röder believes the courts will ultimately compel the federal government to hold firm on their promises to the refugees.

Interview conducted by Marc Dimpfel

Keywords: Germany, Federal Government, Afghan Refugees, Taliban, Pakistan

  1. The legal battle between Afghan refugees and the German government is centered around visas for those who have completed the steps of the federal intake program, a policy designed to enable legal migration for those in grave danger due to Taliban power in Afghanistan, and is part of a larger discussion on politics and general-news.
  2. The federal intake program, established as a response to the Taliban's rise to power in 2021, aimed to protect Afghans involved in civil society, supporting democracy, law, freedom, and human rights, marginalized groups such as women and LGBTQIA members. This policy is now at the center of a political maneuver by the federal government, as they seek to revisit every case under the pretext of security reasons, potentially damaging Germany's international reputation.

Read also:

Latest