Skip to content

Examination uncovers the core's true composition, revealing it as predominantly shit and twigs.

The modern leadership gatherings bear a striking resemblance to the Roman Imperial court, with power dynamics, ceremonial practices, and an air of sycophantic adoration persisting towards the 'sovereign'.

"The true nature of the power is unveiled, revealing its primary components as primarily filth and...
"The true nature of the power is unveiled, revealing its primary components as primarily filth and tree branches"

Examination uncovers the core's true composition, revealing it as predominantly shit and twigs.

In the realm of modern politics, Donald Trump's 2025 engagement with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko marks a significant departure from the norm, challenging Western ostracism of Lukashenko. This unprecedented direct communication and public recognition signals a breakthrough in Minsk’s diplomatic isolation since the disputed 2020 elections.

Trump's interest in Lukashenko, according to analysts, reflects a pragmatic approach to managing complex geopolitical realities. This engagement, partially strategic, is believed to potentially benefit Trump's negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump thanked Lukashenko for releasing sixteen political prisoners, signaling a possible softening stance or pragmatic maneuvering rather than full endorsement. He also expressed a willingness to meet Lukashenko in person, a major diplomatic win for Belarus given its pariah status in most Western capitals.

The evolving relationship between Trump and Lukashenko is a facet of broader U.S.-Russia-Belarus dynamics amid ongoing Ukraine conflict and shifting alliances. Despite this diplomatic thaw, Belarus and Russia continue their close military and economic cooperation, displaying strength to dissuade Western sanctions and military support to Ukraine. This illustrates Lukashenko’s balancing act: leveraging improved ties with the U.S. while maintaining strategic alignment with Russia.

Looking back at the annals of history, the ancient saying "there's nothing new under the sun" rings true in politics. The participants in recent political summits are ordinary people, sometimes funny, sometimes foolish, and sometimes repugnant. Yet, if we look at today's rulers through the lens of the past few centuries, a much greater change becomes evident. The intimidating charm of great dictators and their delusional collective ideas has dissipated.

In the political landscape of two thousand years ago, one of the guests ruled a country on the outskirts of the Roman oikoumene, having long and persistently fought against Scythians or the Parthian kingdom. Ancient historians, such as Suetonius, the two Plinys, and the author of the Historia Augusta, would likely not be surprised by a political meeting in Washington, as a group of allied federates, militarily weaker than Rome, visited the emperor.

The technological revolution has made it possible for political leaders to interact from their homes, like neighbors in a courtyard. Yet, the mystical "king's second body" associated with traditional monarchical power has largely disappeared. What remains of monarchies are decorative crowned heads, playing roles in soap operas and tabloid stories.

In ancient times, women were sometimes seen in ruler roles, such as Cleopatra and Zenobia. However, the current Caesar is not as great as Augustus or Trajan, but he is also not as destructive as Caligula or Nero. He is more like Claudius, but without his intellectual pursuits.

As for Trump, he has reached the limits of his world of fantasies, and it is unclear where he will go next. Predictions suggest he may continue leveraging his relationship with Lukashenko to gain leverage in dealings with Putin and Russia, emphasising debate over sanctions and conflict resolution in Ukraine. A possible in-person meeting with Lukashenko could occur, further legitimizing Lukashenko’s presidency in defiance of Western condemnation. Trump may also pressure Lukashenko for further political prisoner releases or reforms but in a highly calibrated manner that preserves the diplomatic channel without alienating Lukashenko. Trump’s role as a regional peace broker positions him to deepen involvement in Eurasian diplomatic affairs, potentially using Belarus as a diplomatic foothold.

In conclusion, Trump's engagement with Lukashenko reflects a pragmatic approach to geopolitical influence, with potential risks of appearing to legitimize authoritarianism. The evolving relationship is a facet of broader U.S.-Russia-Belarus dynamics amid ongoing Ukraine conflict and shifting alliances.

Read also:

Latest