Skip to content
General-news — Withdrawing — Horrified — Politics — Landmines — Treaty — War-and-conflicts — Latvians

European neighbors of Russia are removing restrictions on landmines; activists express deep concern

The referred entities are labeled as among the globe's deadliest, non-discriminatory weapons. Despite a global agreement curbing their usage in landmines, five European nations have disregarded it, basing their decision on the escalating menace from Russia.

,   and  ASMedia
3 min read
Deadly landmines remain a global concern, yet five European nations overlook a global treaty,...
Deadly landmines remain a global concern, yet five European nations overlook a global treaty, fearing increased threats from Russia.

European neighbors of Russia are removing restrictions on landmines; activists express deep concern

Here's the rewritten article in a straightforward, chatty style, with relevant insights from the enrichment data:

Hey there! Let's talk about a frickin' nerve-wracking situation. Five European countries - Finland, Poland, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania - are considering backing out of an international treaty, known as the Ottawa Treaty, that bans the use of landmines. The reason? Fear of Russian aggression. Yikes!

These countries believe that leaving the agreement will beef up their defense strategies and deter Russia in an unstable environment. But campaigners, non-government organizations, and even experts are freaking out. Why? 'Cause landmines are dangerous, man - they can kill or maim civilians, and they can contaminate an area for years, even decades, after a conflict ends.

The treaty, which also bans the production and stockpiling of landmines, was signed in 1997 and has helped reduce the harm caused by these explosive devices. But warrning bells are ringing now, with Finland, Poland, and Latvia already moving forward with their decision to quit the treaty, while Estonia and Lithuania are considering the same move.

Charities that help those affected by conflict and poverty, like Amnesty International, are slamming the decision. They argue that leaving the Ottawa Treaty is a regressive step and puts civilians at risk. In fact, Amnesty International described Finland's decision as a "disturbing step backwards."

So, why are these countries so keen to bring back landmines? Experts say that Russia has already used landmines during its war with Ukraine, and that these weapons can slow an invasion by redirecting troops, or by holding them up while they try to breach mined areas. In essence, they're seen as a cost-effective way to strengthen a country's defense, especially if it's outnumbered by the enemy.

But it's important to note that Washington won't use landmines in the same way as Moscow's forces. There are significant differences in the design philosophies of mines and cluster munitions between countries concerned about civilian casualties and those that are less bothered about causing them.

Now, let's talk about Ukraine. According to the United Nations, it's the most heavily mined country in the world, with an estimated 174,000 square kilometers of Ukrainian territory littered with landmines and explosive remnants. That means Ukrainian civilians, particularly those returning to areas previously on the front lines, face an ever-present risk of death.

Looking at the implications:

  1. Enhanced Defense Capabilities: Yes, the regions may benefit from a strengthened defense system, but at what cost to civilians?
  2. International Implications: The move could stir up controversy with countries still committed to the Ottawa Convention, potentially creating international tensions.
  3. Humanitarian Concerns: Withdrawal could lead to increased humanitarian risks for civilians in future conflicts, due to the devastating impact of landmines on people's lives.
  4. Regional Security Dynamics: The withdrawal may influence the perceptions and actions of other countries, potentially leading to altered regional security dynamics and increased tensions.

In conclusion, while these countries feel the need to bolster their defenses in response to Russian aggression, the decision to abandon the Ottawa Treaty has alarmed many. They fear that the return of landmines could create an incredibly dangerous situation for civilians, especially those in Ukraine. Stick around, we've got more to unpack on this one!

  1. The Latvians, alongside other European nations, are contemplating withdrawing from the Ottawa Treaty, a global agreement that prohibits the use of landmines, due to fears of Russian aggression, sparking concerns about enhanced defense capabilities at the potential expense of civilian safety.
  2. The political implications of these countries leaving the treaty could stir up international tensions, as it may contradict the commitments made by countries still adhering to the Ottawa Convention, which bans landmines.
  3. Despite the motivation for augmenting defense strategies, the withdrawal from the treaty might exacerbate humanitarian concerns in future war-and-conflicts, given the devastating impact of landmines on civilian populations.
  4. The decision to abandon the Ottawa Treaty may also affect regional security dynamics, prompting other countries to reconsider their attitudes towards landmines and potentially leading to increased tensions within the region.

Read also:

Related

Latest